Comp. by: VPugazhenthi Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_M Date:1/4/
09 Time:15:19:40 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/3B2/
revises/9781405132879_4_M.3d
Its importance was further increased by the
terrorist attacks on the United States on 11
September 2001 and the US-led invasions of
Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003 (see
terrorism).
CENTCOM articulates a highly particular
imaginative geography of the region (Morris-
sey, 2009), but the invasions of Afghanistan
and Iraq were underwritten by, and also
extended, a series of cultural formations that
could be traced back through the long history
of British and American interventions in the
region to a deep-seated Orientalism (Gregory,
2004b). In doing so, they confirmed that the
‘Middle East’ is a profoundly ethnocentric
construction, as Bernard Lewis (1999) once
had it, ‘meaningless, colorless, shapeless, and
for most of the world inaccurate’. This
reached its nadir in portrayals such as this,
from Fareed Zakaria, writing inNewsweek
soon after 9/11: ‘This is the land of suicide
bombers, flag-burners and fiery mullahs.’ In
one astonishing sentence, the various, vibrant
cultures of the region were fixed and frozen
into one diabolical landscape (Gregory, 2004b,
p. 60). And yet this (in)sensibility captured
the accumulatedrhetoricaleffect of con-
structions of the Middle East with dismal fi-
delity. For the ‘Middle East’ as a concept has
been constructed, both geopolitically and dis-
cursively, largely from the ‘outside’: and yet its
problems and predicaments are almost always
assigned solely to those on the ‘inside’. As
Mamdani (2002) put it, within the optic of a
Euro-Americanethnocentrism, the world is
divided into two, ‘so that one part makes cul-
ture and the other is a prisoner of culture’.dg
Suggested reading
Khalidi(1998);Lockman(2004);Scheffler(2003).
migrancy The state or condition of being a
migrant; ‘migrancy’ generally emphasizes the
cultural, social and political constructions and
experiences of migrant groups and displaced
people (cf.migration). Historically, the slow
and discontinuous process of sedentarizing
populations and fixing politicalbordersand
boundarieswas often accompanied by a sus-
picion of those who remained constantly on
the move. Thus, for example, the figure of the
merchant forever travelling to fairs and distant
markets occupied an ambiguous position
within the territorializations offeudalismin
much of medievaleurope, even though such
movements provided essential functions for
trans-regional economies.mobilitywas often
a privilege, to be sure, and it was threaded in
to wider circuits ofpowerand authority, so
that it was (and remains) those who were
homelessand forced to move (through dis-
ease orpoverty, for example) who attracted
the most suspicion and even hostility. Some
social groups regarded migrancy as a cultural
formation constitutive of their veryidentity:
‘travelling peoples’ such as the Roma
(‘Gypsies’), the tramping artisans of nine-
teenth-century Britain (Southall, 1991) or
the hobos of late nineteenth- and early twen-
tieth-century America (DePastino, 2003).
Even thoughglobalizationandmodern-
ityare predicated on movement and depend
on migration, these capacities are still subject
to social discrimination. Under neo-liberal
globalization, the world may be ‘flat’ for busi-
ness travel and international tourism, but
those who travel under other, no less legitim-
ate, signs are subject to policing, restriction
and even detention: the Roma continue to
encountersocial exclusion (Sibley, 1998;
Bancroft, 2005) and groups such asasylum-
seekers andrefugees, and guest-workers in
europe, the Gulf, Asia and Canada, find
their living conditions and civilrightscircum-
scribed by their very migrancy. The suspicion
of migrancy is shared by colonial and post-
colonial states alike, whose governments
often view migrant populations as threats to
their ordering design and apparatus of control.
Pastoralists and shifting cultivators were (and
continue to be) seen by states as lesser produ-
cers whose activities thwart efficiency, erode
environments, and undercut the positiveex-
ternalitiesthat putatively attach to private
propertyand sedentary agriculture (seepas-
toralism). Lurking in these assessments is a
sense that migrancy equates to vagabond con-
duct, an equation that is frequently sharpened
throughracialization: thus the Bedouin in
Israel have been constructed by the Israeli
government as inimical to thepropertyand
political regimes of thesettler stateand,
through their supposedly aberrantspatiality,
left literally ‘out of place’ and ‘suspended in
space’ (Shamir, 1996; Mair, 2008).
In counterpoint to these bleak assessments,
however, and the unilinearteleologyof a
singular Western modernity that sustains
some of them, Gidwani and Sivaramakrishnan
(2003)have emphasizedthat the subject-
positions produced through migrancy cannot
be axiomatically reduce to passivity or victim-
hood and that, in particular circumstances,
these mobilities – often marginalized in con-
ventional accounts – may be vehicles for cul-
tural and political assertion. To recover the
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_M Final Proof page 461 1.4.2009 3:19pm
MIGRANCY