Comp. by: VPugazhenthi Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_S Date:1/4/
09 Time:15:23:35 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/3B2/
revises/9781405132879_4_S.3d
correspondence networks (Ogborn, 2002); the
significance of field trials in the production of
agricultural knowledge (Henke, 2000); the
reciprocal connections between buildings and
the building of scientific knowledge (Gieryn,
2002); and the geography of the commodifi-
cation of bio-information (Parry 2004).
The list could be extendedad libitum. Special
issues of contributions by geographers to the
British Journal for the History of Science(2005)
under the guest editorship of Simon Naylor,
and ofInterdisciplinary Science Reviews(2006) on
‘putting science in its place’, bear witness to the
interdisciplinary richness of these developments.
In the light of all this, there are good
grounds for suggesting that science studies
can coherently be thought of as a branch of
historical geography. In keeping with this
sentiment, Simon Schaffer (2005) has recently
urged that it was the cartographic impulse
itself that helped construct what we think of
as modern science (seecartographic reason;
cartography). Courtesy of several ‘big pic-
ture’ accounts of science history (such as those
of Whewell, Bernal and Needham) that sought
to graphically chart scientific development, it
was – as Schaffer (2005) pointedly observes –
‘mapswhich invented what science was’. At a
more popular level, Simon Jenkins, writing in
the Guardian (Friday, 20 January 2006),
delivers confirmatory judgment, no less pro-
vocatively quipping that ‘All scientists are
geographers. That is why maps are the most
sacred tools of science.’ dnl
Suggested reading
Golinski (1998); Livingstone (2003c).
science park A particular form ofgrowth
poleestablished by property developers or,
sometimes, research institutions to promote
technology transfer and investment in new
industries, usually in conjunction with a uni-
versity and sometimes with regional and/or
local government support. The goal is to cap-
italize on knowledgeclustersin scientific and
technological expertise by ensuring thatinnov-
ationsare developed locally, generating jobs
for the local or regional economy and contrib-
uting to the institution’s costs (see alsoknow-
ledge economy). sw
Suggested reading
Massey, Quintas and Wield (1991).
scientific instrumentation Scientific instru-
ments are purpose-built material tools used
by investigators to disclose, measure and
represent aspects of the natural world. A sub-
set of these devices devoted tosurveyinghas
been used incartography, astronomy, navi-
gation, land survey, geodesy and related geo-
graphical practices. Dating back at least to the
activities of Vitruvius in the first centurybce,
but particularly since the development of prac-
tical mathematics during the Renaissance,
such instruments as the astrolabe, compass
and theodolite were progressively refined until
they were substantially replaced by the more
recent use of signals from satellite systems,
which deliver immediate calculations of exact
locations (Bennett, 1987).
A useful distinction can be made between
instrumentationforgeographyand geograph-
ies ofinstrumentation. In the former case,
scientific instruments have been used in the
garnering of theglobe’s geographically dis-
tributed data and, routinely, to producemaps.
Variations in terrestrial magnetism, for
example, were the subject of much concern
to Edmund Halley who, it was said, set about
‘the rectifying of geography’, by using his own
instruments to determine longitude and pro-
duce charts of magnetic variation (Fara, 2005,
p. 69). Similar matters occupied the attention
of Alexander von Humboldt, who travelled
through South America with a remarkable
range of instruments – chronometers, sextants,
dipping needles, a cyanometer (for measuring
the blueness of the sky), barometers, thermo-
meters, rain gauges, aeromotors, theodolites –
and used the data they delivered to construct
his famousisolinemaps, which were designed
to facilitate the interdisciplinary transfer of
data (Dettelbach, 1999; Godlewska, 1999).
The fundamental role of instruments in the
geographical project – and its colonial preoccu-
pations – was enshrined, during the Victorian
period, in the Royal Geographical Society,
which began systematic courses on surveying
in 1879 (Collier and Inkpen, 2003). Of course,
these practices raised a range ofepistemo-
logicalproblems, rotating around who could
be trusted to deliver reliable information (see
trust), how distant observers were to be
regulated and what were the appropriate
instruments to use in distant places. In an
attempt to address such problems, the
Society published itsGuide to travellersin many
successive editions, in the hope of bringing
discipline and order to distant observers, and
thereby to secure testimonial credibility
(Driver, 2001b).
This latter concern about how to manage
the harvesting of global data for geography is
intimately connected with the whole subject of
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_S Final Proof page 668 1.4.2009 3:23pm
SCIENCE PARK