Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_T Date:31/3/09
Time:21:40:54 Filepath://ppdys1108/BlackwellCup/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-
9781405132879/appln/3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_T.3d
that forecloses questions about the complex
reactivation of older, often colonial images in
our own present (cf. Tavares and Brosseau,
2006) and the ways in which what Lisle
(2006) calls ‘the global politics of contempor-
ary travel writing’ now participates in and
responds to the anxieties created byglobal-
ization. jsd/dg
Suggested reading
Duncan and Gregory (1989); Hume and Youngs
(2002); Lisle (2006).
travelling theory Intellectual ideas that
move from one location to another and, in
the process, change in response to new cir-
cumstances. The original formulation was by
Edward Said, who identified three critical
moments:
The first wasorigination, the circumstances
within which a body of ideas emerges.
Ideas are not free-floating constructions,
on this reading, and their analysis requires
what historians of science and of geog-
raphy call a ‘contextual history’. Said
(1984, pp. 241–2) called for a ‘critical con-
sciousness’, a ‘spatial sense, a sort of meas-
uring faculty for locating or situating
theory’ by understanding it ‘in the place
and time out of which it emerges as part
of that time, working in and for it, respond-
ing to it’ (cf.situated knowledge).
The second wasinstitutionalization. Said
knew very well that ideas move – the cir-
culation of ideas is an enabling condition
of intellectual activity – but he was also
concerned that as radical, unsettling
ideas become fashionable so they are
domesticated: ‘Once an idea gains cur-
rency because it is clearly effective and
powerful, there is every likelihood that dur-
ing its peregrinations it will be reduced,
codified and institutionalized’ (Said,
1984, p. 239).
The third wasrevivification. Said subse-
quently accepted that a theory could be
reinterpreted and reinvigorated by travel-
ling and responding to a new situation.
These transgressive theorizations – his ex-
amples were Adorno and Fanon – give one
a sense of ‘the geographical dispersion of
which the theoretical motor is capable’ by
pulling ideas from one region to another
and realizing the productive possibility of
‘actively different locales, sites, situations
for theory’ – a sense of active, operative,
concrete differences – that allow no ‘facile
universalism or over-general totalizing’
(Said, 2000 [1994], p. 452).
Said’s own account oforientalismhas been
interpreted as a classic instance of travelling
theory (Brennan, 2000).
Inhuman geographytravelling theory has
its place in a wider landscape that includes
geographies of intellectual production, dis-
semination and circulation, and reception.
Journeying across this landscape raises import-
ant and interrelated questions about the fix-
ation of hightheoryon fashionable thinkers;
about thecommodity chainsthat make up
the international publishing industry; about
the trafficking in metropolitan ‘high theory’
and the use of other regions as resource banks;
about the dominance of English-language
publication and the problems of translation
(seeanglocentrism); and about the place of
the modern corporate university and its rela-
tion to other sites at which geographical know-
ledge is produced (cf.public geographies).
It is not only ideas that travel, and Living-
stone (2003b) sees travelling theory as part of
a larger apparatus of circulation that is indis-
pensable to the scientific enterprise: ‘Ideas and
instruments, texts and theories, individuals
and inventions – to name but a very few – all
diffuse across the surface of the earth (see
science).’ Their circulation raises similar
questions about the hierarchies and thenet-
worksthrough which they move, both in-
wards and outwards, and their reception and
reworking also raises questions about
ideologiesof respect and techniques oftrust:
‘Scientific knowledge has been expanded by
circulation...[but] distance and doubt have
always been close companions’ (p. 178). dg
Suggested reading
Said (1984).
trend surface analysis A technique devel-
oped by Chorley and Haggett (1965) for
generalizing the pattern in a set of geograph-
ical data. It usually employs a form of multiple
regressionin which the independent vari-
ables are the grid coordinates for the obser-
vations and the dependent variable is some
item of interest measured there – such as
land elevation. The aim is to identify the sali-
ent features of a complex three-dimensional
surface. rj
trialectics A term proposed by the
American geographer Edward Soja (1996b)
as ‘a mode of dialectical reasoning that is
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_T Final Proof page 775 31.3.2009 9:40pm Compositor Name: ARaju
TRIALECTICSTRIALECTICS