Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_T Date:31/3/09
Time:21:40:54 Filepath://ppdys1108/BlackwellCup/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-
9781405132879/appln/3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_T.3d
more inherently spatial than the convention-
ally temporally-defined dialectics of Marx or
Hegel’ (p. 10). In contrast todialectics, Soja
identified three moments (not two), each of
which is supposed to contain the others. Soja’s
purpose was to insist on the importance of the
‘third term’ in order ‘to defend against any
binary reductionism or totalization’. This is
more than an exercise in logic, although Soja
develops his argument at a high level ofab-
straction. He proposes two basic trialectics
(see figure).
The first trialectic is primarily concerned
with ontology: Soja (1996b, pp. 71–3)
describes this as thetrialectics of being, and
uses it to diagram the production oftime,
being-in-the-world and space: his argument
turns on the claim that runs throughout his
later writings that the ‘third term’,space,is
characteristically erased in conventionalso-
cial theory(cf. Soja, 1989).
The second trialectic is primarily concerned
withepistemology: Soja (1996b, pp. 73–82)
describes this as thetrialectics of spatiality, and
uses it to diagram three approaches tospati-
ality. These are derived from his reading of
Henri Lefebvre’s account of theproduction
of space. Following Lefebvre, then, Soja ar-
gues that most discourses of spatiality have
been confined to the realms of either:
(1) spatial practices, a space ofobjectivity
and object-ness, of ‘perceived space’,
that Soja callsFirstspace;or
(2) representations of space, a space of signifi-
cation and subject-ness, of ‘conceived
space’, that Soja callsSecondspace.
Here too it is the force of the ‘third term’ that
Soja seeks to release:
(3) spaces of representation, whererepresen-
tationcarries both political and cultural
connotations, and whose animation as
‘lived space’ corresponds to the subver-
sive, radical and even revolutionary po-
tential of what Soja identifies as
Thirdspace(seethird space). dg
Suggested reading
Soja (1996b, pp. 53–82); Merrifield (1996).
tricontinentalism An alternative term to
post-colonialismthat emphasizes thetrans-
national locationsand thepolitical implicationsof
critiques of colonialismandimperialism.
The substitution was proposed by British
literary/critical theorist Robert Young, who
invoked the Tricontinental Conference, the
meeting of the Organization of Solidarity
of the Peoples of Africa, Asia and Latin
America’, in Havana, Cuba in 1966 as, in
effect, ‘the founding moment of postcolonial
theory’ (Young, 2001, p. 5). Most accounts of
post-colonial theory focus on three canonical
figures – Edward Said, Homi Bhabha and
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak – rather than
threecontinents. Young acknowledges the
importance of these academic writings, but
the purpose of Young’s redirection was two-
fold. First, he wanted to transcend theeuro-
centrismof much of what passes for ‘theory’
by drawing attention to the vital importance of
those ‘insurgent knowledges that come from
the subaltern, the dispossessed, and [which]
Being
Spatiality
Sociality
Historicality
(a) (b)
Spatiality
Lived
Conceived
Perceived
trialectics (a) Ontology: ‘trialectics of being’; (b) Epistemology: ‘trialectics of spatiality’
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_T Final Proof page 776 31.3.2009 9:40pm Compositor Name: ARaju
TRICONTINENTALISM