390 Conditioning and Learning
Azorlosa, J. L., & Cicala, G. A. (1988). Increased conditioning in
rats to a blocked CS after the first compound trial. Bulletin of the
Psychonomic Society, 26,254–257.
Baker, A. G., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1977). Excitatory and inhibitory
conditioning following uncorrelated presentations of the CS and
UCS.Animal Learning & Behavior, 5,315–319.
Balaz, M. A., Gutsin, P., Cacheiro, H., & Miller, R. R. (1982).
Blocking as a retrieval failure: Reactivation of associations to a
blocked stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy, 34B,99–113.
Balaz, M. A., Kasprow, W. J., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Blocking with
a single compound trial. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10,
271–276.
Balleine, B. (1992). Instrumental performance following a shift in
primary motivation depends upon incentive learning. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18,
236–250.
Balsam, P. D. (1984). Relative time in trace conditioning. In
J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences: Timing and Time Perception(Vol. 243, pp. 211–227).
Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Batson, J. D., & Batsell, W. R., Jr. (2000). Augmentation, not block-
ing, in an A+/AX+ flavor-conditioning procedure. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 7,466–471.
Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of
the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20,137–153.
Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching
law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 22,231–242.
Baum, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatching, and overmatching
in studies of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of
Behavior, 32,269–281.
Baum, W. M. (1993). Performances on ratio and interval schedules
of reinforcement: Data and theory. Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 59,245–264.
Baum, W. M., & Rachlin, H. C. (1969). Choice as time allocation.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12,861–874.
Belke, T. W. (1992). Stimulus preference and the transitivity of
preference.Animal Learning & Behavior, 20,401–406.
Bennett, C. H., Wills, S. J., Oakeshott, S. M., & Mackintosh, N. J.
(2000). Is the context specificity of latent inhibition a sufficient
explanation of learned irrelevance? Quarterly Journal of Exper-
imental Psychology, 53B,239–253.
Berkeley, G. (1946). A treatise concerning the principles of human
knowledge.La Salle, IL: Open Court Publication Co. (Reprinted
from 1710, Dublin, Ireland: Jeremy Pepyat)
Best, M. R., Dunn, D. P., Batson, J. D., Meachum, C. L., & Nash,
S. M. (1985). Extinguishing conditioned inhibition in flavour-
aversion learning: Effects of repeated testing and extinction of
the excitatory element. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology, 37B,359–378.
Bonardi, C., & Hall, G. (1996). Learned irrelevance: No more
than the sum of CS and US preexposure effects? Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22,
183–191.
Bonem, M., & Crossman, E. K. (1988). Elucidating the effects of
reinforcement magnitude. Psychological Bulletin, 104,348–362.
Bouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1979). Contextual control of the
extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation, 10,
445–466.
Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms.
American Psychologist, 16,681–684.
Brogden, W. J. (1939). Sensory pre-conditioning. Journal of Exper-
imental Psychology, 25,323–332.
Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1993). A retrieval cue for extinc-
tion attenuates spontaneous recovery. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19,77–89.
Burger, D. C., Mallemat, H., & Miller, R. R. (2000). Overshadow-
ing of subsequent events and recovery thereafter. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B,149–171.
Burns, M., & Domjan, M. (1996). Sign tracking versus goal track-
ing in the sexual conditioning of male Japanese quail (Coturnix
japonica).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behav-
ior Processes, 22,297–306.
Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1951). A mathematical model for sim-
ple learning. Psychological Review, 58,313–323.
Caraco, T., Martindale, S., & Whittam, T. S. (1980). An empirical
demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Animal
Behaviour, 28,820–830.
Catania, A. C. (1963). Concurrent performances: A baseline for the
study of reinforcement magnitude. Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 6,299–300.
Catania, A. C., & Reynolds, G. S. (1968). A quantitative analysis
of responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforce-
ment.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11,
327–383.
Cheatle, M. D., & Rudy, J. W. (1978). Analysis of second-order
odor-aversion conditioning in neonatal rats: Implications for
Kamin’s blocking effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Animal Behavior Processes, 4,237–249.
Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal
induction.Psychological Review, 99,365–382.
Chung, S.-H., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1967). Choice and delay of rein-
forcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10,
67–74.
Clarke, J. C., Westbrook, R. F., & Irwin, J. (1979). Potentiation in-
stead of overshadowing in the pigeon. Behavioral and Neural
Biology, 25,18–29.
Clayton, N. S., & Dickinson, A. (1999). Scrub jays (Aphelocoma
coerulescens) remember the relative time of caching as well as
the location and content of their caches. Journal of Comparative
Psychology, 113,403–416.