References 391Cole, M. R. (1999). Molar and molecular control in variable-
interval and variable-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimen-
tal Analysis of Behavior, 71,319–328.
Collier, G., Hirsch, E., & Hamlin, P. H. (1972). The economic de-
terminants of reinforcement in the rat. Physiology and Behavior,
9,705–716.
Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Associations between the
discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learn-
ing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior
Processes, 14,155–164.
Cosmides, K., & Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain-specificity:
The evolution of functional organization. In L. A. Hirschfeld &
S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in
cognition and culture(pp. 85–116). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Dalrymple, A. J., & Galef, B. G. (1981). Visual discrimination pre-
training facilitates subsequent visual cue/toxicosis conditioning
in rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18,267–270.
Davidson, T. L., Aparicio, J., & Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Transfer
between Pavlovian facilitators and instrumental discriminative
stimuli.Animal Learning & Behavior, 16,285–291.
Davison, M., & Jenkins, P. E. (1985). Stimulus discriminability,
contingency discriminability, and schedule performance. Animal
Learning & Behavior, 13,77–84.
Davison, M. & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research
review.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dearing, M. F., & Dickinson, A. (1979). Counterconditioning of
shock by a water reinforcer in rabbits. Animal Learning &
Behavior, 7,360–366.
Denniston, J. C., Blaisdell, A. P., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Temporal
coding affects transfer of serial and simultaneous inhibitors.
Animal Learning & Behavior, 26,336–350.
Denniston, J. C., Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological
significance as a determinant of cue competition. Psychological
Science, 7,235–331.
Denniston, J. C., Savastano, H. I., & Miller, R. R. (2001). The ex-
tended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, respond-
ing by relative strength. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.),
Handbook of contemporary learning theories(pp. 65–117).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
de Villiers, P. A., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1976). Toward a law of
response strength. Psychological Bulletin, 33,1131–1153.
DeVito, P. L., & Fowler, H. (1987). Enhancement of conditioned
inhibition via an extinction treatment. Animal Learning &
Behavior, 15,448–454.
Dickinson, A. (1980). Contemporary animal learning theory.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dickinson, A. (1994). Instrumental conditioning. In N. J. Mackintosh
(Ed.),Animal learning and cognition(pp. 45–79). New York:
Academic Press.
Dickinson, A., & Balleine, B. (1994). Motivational control of goal-
directed action. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22,1–18.
Dickinson, A., Balleine, B., Watt, A., Gonzalez, F., & Boakes, R. A.
(1995). Motivational control after extended instrumental train-
ing.Animal Learning & Behavior, 23,197–206.
Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations
mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B,60–80.
Dickinson, A., & Charnock, D. J. (1985). Contingency effects with
maintained instrumental reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 37B,397–416.
Dinsmoor, J. A. (1998). Punishment. In W. T. O’Donohue (Ed.),
Learning and behavior therapy(pp. 188–204). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Domjan, M. (1983). Biological constraints on instrumental and clas-
sical conditioning: Implications for general process theory. In
G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation
(Vol. 17, pp. 215–277). New York: Academic Press.
Domjan, M., & Hollis, K. L. (1988). Reproductive behavior: A
potential model system for adaptive specializations in learning.
In R. C. Bolles & M. D. Beecher (Eds.), Evolution and learning
(pp. 213–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Durlach, P. J., & Rescorla, R. A. (1980). Potentiation rather than
overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms
of within-compound associations. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6,175–187.
Egger, M. D., & Miller, N. E. (1963). When is a reward reinforc-
ing? An experimental study of the information hypothesis.
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56,
132–137.
Eikelboom, R., & Stewart, J. (1982). Conditioning of drug-induced
psychological responses.Psychological Review, 89,507–528.
Escobar, M., Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (2001). Conditions fa-
voring retroactive interference between antecedent events and
between subsequent events. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8,
691–697.
Escobar, M., Matute, H., & Miller, R. R. (2001). Cues trained apart
compete for behavioral control in rats: Convergence with the
associative interference literature. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 130,97–115.
Estes, W. K. (1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psycho-
logical Review, 57,94–170.
Estes, W. K., & Burke, C. J. (1953). A theory of stimulus variability
in learning. Psychological Review, 60,276–286.
Etienne, A. S., Berlie, J., Georgakopoulos, J., & Maurer, R. (1998).
Role of dead reckoning in navigation. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial
representation in animals(pp. 54–68). Oxford, UK: Oxford.
Fantino, E. (1969). Choice and rate of reinforcement. Journal of the
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12,723–730.
Fantino, E. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and in-
formation. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook
of operant behavior(pp. 313–339). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.