References 395limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 106,226–254.
Nevin, J. A. (1969). Interval reinforcement of behavior in discrete
trials.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12,
875–885.
Nevin, J. A. (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules. Jour-
nal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21,389–408.
Nevin, J. A. (1979). Reinforcement schedules and response
strength. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Reinforcement and
the organization of behaviour(pp. 117–158). Chichester, UK:
Wiley.
Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R. C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the
law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23,73–130
(includes commentary).
Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C., & Atak, J. R. (1983). The analysis of be-
havioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of
Behavior, 39,49–59.
Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: A
resolution.Psychological Review, 56,132–143.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes.London: Oxford Univer-
sity Press.
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlov-
ian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94,61–73.
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1978). Overshadowing the instrumental
conditioning of a lever press response by a more valid predictor
of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal
Behavior Processes, 4,356–367.
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning:
Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of uncon-
ditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87,532–552.
Postman, L. (1947). The history and present status of the law of
effect. Psychological Bulletin, 44,489–563.
Postman, L., Stark, K., & Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in
interference.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7,
672–694.
Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement theory. In D. Levine (Ed.),
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 123–180).
Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Rachlin, H. (1995). Self-control: Beyond commitment. Behavioral
and Brain Sciences, 18,101–159 (includes commentary).
Rachlin, H. (1997). Four teleological theories of addiction. Psycho-
nomic Bulletin & Review, 4,462–473.
Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J., & Green, L. (1981). Maximiza-
tion theory in behavioral psychology. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 4,371–417 (includes commentary).
Rachlin, H., & Burkhard, B. (1978). The temporal triangle:
Response substitution in instrumental conditioning. Psychologi-
cal Review, 85,22–47.
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-
control.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17,
15–22.
Rachlin, H., Green, L., Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. (1976).
Economic demand theory and psychological studies of choice.
In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation
(Vol. 10, pp. 129–154). New York: Academic Press.
Rachlin, H., Green, L., & Tormey, B. (1988). Is there a decisive test
between matching and maximizing? Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 50,113–123.
Randich, A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Associative and nonassocia-
tive theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon. Psychologi-
cal Bulletin, 86,523–548.
Rashotte, M. E., Marshall, B. S., & O’Connell, J. M. (1981). Sig-
naling functions of the second-order CS: Partial reinforcement
during second-order conditioning of the pigeon’s keypeck.
Animal Learning & Behavior, 9,253–260.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and
absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and
Physiological Psychology, 66,1–5.
Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psycho-
logical Bulletin, 72,77–94.
Rescorla, R. A. (1991). Associative relations in instrumental learn-
ing: The Eighteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Jour-
nal of Experimental Psychology, 43B,1–23.
Rescorla, R. A., & Cunningham, C. L. (1979). Spatial contiguity
facilitates Pavlovian second-order conditioning. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5,152–
161.
Rescorla, R. A., & Furrow, D. R. (1977). Stimulus similarity as a de-
terminant of Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3,203–215.
Rescorla, R. A., & Holland, P. C. (1977). Associations in Pavlovian
conditioned inhibition.Learning and Motivation, 8,429–447.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian con-
ditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and
non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),
Classical conditioning: Vol. 2. Current theory and research
(pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Riccio, D. C., Richardson, R., & Ebner, D. L. (1984). Memory re-
trieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox.
Psychological Bulletin, 96,152–165.
Rizley, R. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Associations in second-
order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. Journal of
Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81,1–11.
Roberts, S. (1981). Isolation of an internal clock.Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7,242–268.
Romaniuk, C. B., & Williams, D. A. (2000). Conditioning across
the duration of a backward conditioned stimulus.Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26,
454–461.
Ross, B. H., & Makin, V. S. (1999). Prototype versus exemplar mod-
els in cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition
(pp. 206–241). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.