Handbook of Psychology, Volume 4: Experimental Psychology

(Axel Boer) #1

570 Reading


Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J.
(2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recog-
nition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108,204–256.
Crowder, R. G., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). The Psychology of read-
ing.New York: Oxford University Press.
Daneman, M., & Reingold, E. M. (1993). What eye fixations tell us
about phonological recoding during reading. Canadian Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 47,153–178.
Daneman, M., & Reingold, E. M. (2000). Do readers use phonolog-
ical codes to activate word meanings? Evidence from eye move-
ments. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.),
Reading as a perceptual process(pp. 447–474). Amsterdam:
North Holland.
Daneman, M., Reingold, E. M., & Davidson, M. (1995). Time
course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from
eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 21,884–898.
DenBuurman, R., Boersma, T., & Gerrissen, J. F. (1981). Eye move-
ments and the perceptual span in reading.Reading Research
Quarterly, 16,227–235.
Dodge, R. (1900). Visual perception during eye movement. Psycho-
logical Review, 7,454–465.
Duffy, S. A., Kambe, G., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effect of prior
disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous
words: Evidence from eye fixations. In D. Gorfein (Ed.), On the
consequences of meaning selection(pp. 27–43). Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity
and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language,
27,429–446.
Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word per-
ception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20,641–655.
Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract
graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 33A,325–350.
Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. (1979). Automatic and attentional pro-
cesses in the effects of sentence context on word recognition.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18,1–20.
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors dur-
ing sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of
structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14,
178–210.
Gautier, V., O’Regan, J. K., & LaGargasson, J. F. (2000). ‘The skip-
ping’ revisited in French: programming saccades to skip the arti-
cle ‘les’. Vision Research, 40,2517–2531.
Gibson, E. J. (1971). Perceptual learning and the theory of word
perception.Cognitive Psychology, 2,351–368.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh &
I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye(pp. 331–358).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading
acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models.
Psychological Review, 106,491–528.
Hawkins, H. L., Reicher, G. M., Rogers, M., & Peterson, L. (1976).
Flexible coding in work recognition. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Human Perception and Performance, 2,380–385.
Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for
reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology, 2,235–242.
Henderson, J. M., Dixon, P., Petersen, A., Twilley, L. C., & Ferreira,
F. (1995). Evidence for the use of phonological representations
during transsaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21,82–97.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing
difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for at-
tention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16,417–429.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control dur-
ing reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal
processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology, 47,201–221.
Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading.New
York: Macmillan.
Hyönä, J. (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers’
attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
21,68–81.
Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (1990). Eye movements in repeated reading
of a text. Acta Psychologica, 73,259–280.
Hyönä, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye movement patterns among
dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word
frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 21,1430–1440.
Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound
words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 24,1612–1627.
Ikeda, M., & Saida, S. (1978). Span of recognition in reading. Vision
Research, 18,83–88.
Inhoff, A. W. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fix-
ations in the reading of prose. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Verbal Behavior, 23,612–624.
Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade
computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15,
544–555.
Inhoff, A. W., & Briihl, D. (1991). Semantic processing of unat-
tended text during selective reading: How the eyes see it. Per-
ception & Psychophysics, 49,289–294.
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomo-
tor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of
Free download pdf