References 595Miller, G. A. (1996). The science of words.New York: Freeman.
Miller, J. R., & W. Kintsch (1980). Readability and recall for short
passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Human Learning and Memory, 6,335–354.
Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading
skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension.
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47,360–374.
Myers, J. L., Cook, A. E., Kambe, G., Mason, R., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2000). Semantic and episodic effects on bridging inferences.
Discourse Processes, 29,179–199.
Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence
of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension
in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,488–496.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of
comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activi-
ties.Cognition and Instruction, 1,117–175.
Rayner, K., Pacht, J. M., & Duffy, S. A. (1994). Effects of prior en-
counter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically
ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of
Memory and Language, 33,527–544.
Recht, D. R., & Leslie, L. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good
and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,16–20.
Revlin, R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Resolving signals to cohesion:
Two models of bridging inference. Discourse Processes, 27,
77–102.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of
knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E.
Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge
(pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts:
Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall
in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92,
85–95.
Sanders, T. J. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coher-
ence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing.
Discourse Processes, 29,37–60.
Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and
understanding.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schneider, W., Körkel, J., & Weinert, F. (1989). Domain-specific
knowledge and memory performance: A comparison of high-
and low-aptitude children. Journal of Educational Psychology,
81,306–312.
Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among selec-
tive details. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90,3–12.
Seuren, P. A. M. (1985). Discourse semantics.New York: Basil
Blackwell.
Singer, M., Andrusiak, P., Reisdorf, P., & Black, N. L. (1992). Indi-
vidual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory &
Cognition, 20,539–548.
Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory
capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing.
Memory & Cognition, 24,733–743.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehen-
sion: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18,645–659.
Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of prim-
ing for associate and inference words in a discourse context.
Memory & Cognition, 16,283–298.
van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996).
A “landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation
and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. K.
Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text
(pp. 165–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
van Dijk, T. A. (1972). Some aspects of text grammars.The Hague,
The Netherlands: Mouton.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse
comprehension.New York: Academic Press.
Walker, C. H. (1987). Relative importance of domain knowledge
and overall aptitude on acquisition of domain-related knowl-
edge.Cognition and Instruction, 4,25–42.
Walker, C. I., & Yekovich, F. R. (1984). Script based inferences:
Effects of text and knowledge variables on recognition memory.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23,357–370.
Whitney, P., Budd, D., Bramucci, R. S., & Crane, R. S. (1995). On
babies, bathwater, and schemata: A reconsideration of top-down
processes in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20,135–166.
Whitney, P., Ritchie, B. G., & Clark, M. B. (1991). Working-
memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text
comprehension.Discourse Processes, 14,133–145.
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multi-
ple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just
memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,
301–311.
Wolfe, M. B. W., Schreiner, M. E., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P.,
Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning from text:
Matching readers and texts by Latent Semantic Analysis. Dis-
course Processes, 25,309–336.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in lan-
guage comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123,
162–185.