Unit 2
HO 2-4 (continued)
nesses
are fairly sell-contained
and self-supporting,
thereb'
exhibiting
little dependency for raw
materials whereas others*
are almost totally
dependent on their
suppliers. Vulnerability
refers to
the extent to which the business
would be affected
by
breakdowns
in the supply network. The
vulnerability of a busi
ness is determined
by the number of competing
suppliers who
could provide input
items for the business,
and the track record
of these suppliers.
In general, if fewer
sources of supply exist,
the
business is more vulnerable
to the arbitrary actions
of the
suppliers.
Sometimes the dependency
and vulnerability issues
surface
over
key customers rather
then key suppliers. If, for
example,
a small business is
a captive supplier of a larger
firm-that is,
it sells nearly all
of its product to one
customer-then it is
extremely vulnerable when
the larger firm encounters
a strike
or significant downturn.
In most cases the
larger firm survives
the trauma,
but the smaller, dependent
firm cannot.
In consi iering
high dependency and/or
vulnerability, it is
critical
to be dware of forces
that may affect the availability
of
raw materials
as well as their price
and delivery schedule.
For
example,
a small company sold
fine chocolate candies.
Through
astute marketing
to local businesses, restaurants,
and hotels
they had established an
e .tensive demand for the
candies.
The profitability
of the firm, and
indeed its survival, was
threatened'by the fact
that the firm had entered
into an exclu
sive contract
with a single supplier.
This supplier was a
small,
fledgling operation
located nearly
500 miles from the store.
It
was one of the
few suppliers that took
an interest in the com
pany.
Unfortunately, as the
candy store's reputation
grew and
demand expanded,
its supplier was
nable to provide the
needed
candies. Extensive
backlogs existed and customers,
quite
understandably, became
frustrated. Before the
candy store was
able
to sever its relationship
with its supplier and search
out
larger,
more consistent sources,
customer confidence
had eroded
to the point
that the business was doomed.
Again, careful anal
ysis of
the supplier, its capacity
and ability to deliver,
coupled
with the firms
own projections of demand,
should have enabled
PartOne The
Analysis Phase
177
3