Unit 2HO 2-4 (continued)nesses
are fairly sell-contained
and self-supporting,
thereb'exhibiting
little dependency for raw
materials whereas others*are almost totally
dependent on their
suppliers. Vulnerabilityrefers to
the extent to which the business
would be affected
bybreakdowns
in the supply network. The
vulnerability of a business is determined
by the number of competing
suppliers whocould provide input
items for the business,
and the track recordof these suppliers.
In general, if fewer
sources of supply exist,the
business is more vulnerable
to the arbitrary actions
of thesuppliers.Sometimes the dependency
and vulnerability issues
surfaceover
key customers rather
then key suppliers. If, for
example,a small business is
a captive supplier of a larger
firm-that is,it sells nearly all
of its product to one
customer-then it isextremely vulnerable when
the larger firm encounters
a strikeor significant downturn.
In most cases the
larger firm survivesthe trauma,
but the smaller, dependent
firm cannot.In consi iering
high dependency and/or
vulnerability, it iscritical
to be dware of forces
that may affect the availability
ofraw materials
as well as their price
and delivery schedule.
Forexample,
a small company sold
fine chocolate candies.
Throughastute marketing
to local businesses, restaurants,
and hotelsthey had established an
e .tensive demand for the
candies.The profitability
of the firm, and
indeed its survival, wasthreatened'by the fact
that the firm had entered
into an exclusive contract
with a single supplier.
This supplier was a
small,fledgling operation
located nearly
500 miles from the store.
Itwas one of the
few suppliers that took
an interest in the company.
Unfortunately, as the
candy store's reputation
grew anddemand expanded,
its supplier was
nable to provide theneeded
candies. Extensive
backlogs existed and customers,
quiteunderstandably, became
frustrated. Before the
candy store wasable
to sever its relationship
with its supplier and search
outlarger,
more consistent sources,
customer confidence
had erodedto the point
that the business was doomed.
Again, careful analysis of
the supplier, its capacity
and ability to deliver,
coupledwith the firms
own projections of demand,
should have enabledPartOne The
Analysis Phase177
3