Homology and Homoplasy 449[Hall, 2007b]B. K. Hall. Tapping Many Sources: The Adventitious Roots of Evo-Devo in the
19 thCentury. In M. D. Laubichler and J. Maienschein (eds.),From Embryology to Evo-Devo.
A History of Embryology in the 20th Century, Symposium of the Dibner Institute for the
History of Science, MIT. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 2007.
[Hall and Olson, 2003]B. K. Hall and W. M. Olson (eds.).Keywords & Concepts in Evolution-
ary Developmental Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA., 2003.
[Hallet al., 2004] B. K. Hall, R. Pearson, and G. B. M ̈uller (eds.).Environment, Development,
and Evolution: Toward a Synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge MA., 2004.
[Hallgr ́ımssonet al., 2005]B. Hallgr ́ımsson, J. J. Y. Brown, and B. K. Hall. The study of pheno-
typic variability: An emerging research agenda for understanding the developmental-genetic
architecture underlying phenotypic variation. In: B. Hallgrimsson, and B. K. Hall (eds.),Vari-
ation: A Central Concept in Biology. Elsevier/Academic Press, New York, pages 525–551,
2005.
[Hallgr ́ımsson and Hall, 2005]B. Hallgr ́ımsson and B. K. Hall.Variation: A Central Concept
in Biology. Elsevier/Academic Press, New York, pages 1–7, 2005.
[Holland and Holland, 2001] L. Z. Holland and N. D. Holland. Evolution of neural crest and
placodes: amphioxus as a model for the ancestral vertebrate?J. Anat., 199: 85–98, 2001.
[Hopson, 1966]J. A. Hopson. The origin of the mammalian middle ear.Amer. Zool., 6: 437–450,
1966.
[Howell, 1970]A. B. Howell.Aquatic Mammals. Their Adaptation to Life in the Water.Dover
Publications, New York, 1970. [A reprint of the 1930 edition.]
[Hubbs, 1944]C. T. Hubbs. Concepts of homology and analogy.Amer. Natl,, 78: 289–307, 1944.
[Huxley, 1864] T. H. Huxley.Lectures on the Elements of Comparative Anatomy. London, 1864.
[Huxley, 1894] T. H. Huxley. Owen’s position in the history of Anatomical Science. In:The Life
of Richard Owen by his Grandson R. Owen. Volume 2, pages 273–332, John Murray, London,
1894.
[Kellogg and Shaffer, 1993]E. A. Kellogg and H. B. Shaffer. Model organisms in evolutionary
studies.Syst. Biol., 42: 409–414, 1993.
[Klima, 1990]M. Klima. Rudiments of the clavicle in the embryos of whales (Cetacea).Z.
S ̈augetierkunde, 55: 202–212, 1990.
[Kurt ́en, 1963] B. Kurt ́en. Return of a lost structure in the evolution of the felid dentition.Soc.
Sci. Fennica Comm. Biol., B 26: 1–12, 1963.
[Lande, 1978]R. Lande. Evolutionary mechanisms of limb loss in tetrapods.Evolution, 32: 73–
92, 1978.
[Lankester, 1870a] E. R. Lankester. On the use of the term homology in modern zoology, and
the distinction between homogenetic and homoplastic agreements.Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.,6,
Ser. 4: 34–43, 1870.
[Lankester, 1870b]E. R. Lankester. On the use of the term “homology”.Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.,
6, Ser. 4: 342, 1870.
[Lankester, 1911]E. R. Lankester. Zoology. InThe Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., Vol. 28,
p. 1029. The Encyclopædia Britannica Company, New York, 1911.
[Laporte, 2000]L. F. Laporte. George Gaylord Simpson. Paleontologist and Evolutionist.
Columbia University Press, New York, 2000.
[Lee and Shine, 1998] M. S. Y. Lee and R. Shine. Reptilian viviparity and Dollo’s Law.Evolu-
tion, 52: 1441–1450, 1998.
[Lombard and Bolt, 1979]R. E. Lombard and J. R. Bolt. Evolution of the tetrapod ear: An
analysis and reinterpretation.Biol. J Linn. Soc, 11: 19–76, 1979.
[Maclise, 1846]J. Maclise. On the nomenclature of anatomy.Lancet, March 14: 298–301, 1846.
[Maier, 1990] W. Maier. Phylogeny and ontogeny of mammalian middle ear structures.Neth.
J. Zool., 40: 55–74, 1990.
[Marshallet al., 1994] C. R. Marshall, E. C. Raff, and R. A. Raff. Dollo’s Law and the death
and resurrection of genes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,91: 12283–12287, 1994.
[Martindaleet al., 2004]M.Q. Martindale, K. Pang, and J.R. Finnerty. Investigating the origins
of triploblasty: “Mesodermal” gene expression in a diploblastic animal, the sea anemone,
Nematostella vectensis(phylum, Cnidaria; Class Anthozoa).Development, 131: 2463–2474,
2004.
[Matthen, 2000]M. Matthen. What is a hand? What is a mind?Rev. Int. Philos., 214: 653–672,
2000.