450 Brian K. Hall
[Mayr, 1982] E. Mayr.The Growth of Biological Thought. Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance.
The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA., 1982.
[McGhee, 2000] J. D. McGhee. Homologous tails? Or tails of homology?BioEssays, 22: 781–
785, 2000.
[McKitrick, 1986] M. C. McKitrick. Individual variation in the flexor cruris lateralis muscle of
the Tyrannidae (Aves, Passeriformes) and its possible significance.J. Zool, 209: 251–270,
1986.
[McShea, 1996]D. W. McShea. Complexity and homoplasy. In M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford
(eds.),Homoplasy: the Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution, pages 207–225. Academic Press,
San Diego, 1996.
[McShea, 2000]D. W. McShea. Functional complexity in organisms: parts as proxies.Biol. &
Philos., 15: 641–668, 2000.
[Meckel, 1811] J. F. Meckel.Entwurf einer Darstellung der zwischen dem Embryozustande der
h ̈oheren Tiere und dem permanenten der niederen stattfindenen Parallele:Beytr ̈age zur ver-
gleichenden Anatomie. Volume 2. Karl Heinrich Reclam, Leipzig, 1811
[Meyer, 1999]A. Meyer. Homology and homoplasy: The retention of genetic programmes. In
G. R. Bock and G. Cardew (eds.),Homology, Novartis Foundation Symposium 222, pages
141–157. Wiley, Chichester, 1999.
[Meyrick, 1927]E. Meyrick.A Revised Handbook of British Lepidoptera. London, 1927.
[Minsuk and Keller,, 1996]S. B. Minsuk and R. E. Keller. Dorsal mesoderm has a dual origin
and forms by a novel mechanism inHymenochirus,arelativeofXenopus.Devel. Biol., 174:
92–103, 1996.
[Mitchell, 1910]P. C. Mitchell. Biogenesis. InThe Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed, vol. 3,
page 952. The Encyclopædia Britannica Company, New York, 1910.
[Mivart, 1870]St. G. Mivart. On the use of the term “homology”.Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 4,
6: 112–127, 1870.
[Mivart, 1871]St.G.Mivart.On the Genesis of Species. Appleton and Co., New York, 1871.
[Moment, 1945] G. B. Moment. The relationship between serial and special homology and or-
ganic similarities.Amer. Natl., 79: 445–455, 1945.
[Moore, 1986] J. A. Moore. Science as a way of knowing-Developmental Biology.Amer. Zool.,
27: 1–159, 1986.
[M ̈uller, 1864]F. M ̈uller.F ̈ur Darwin. Engelmann, Leipzig, 1864.
[M ̈uller, 1869]F. (J. F. T) M ̈uller.Facts and Arguments for Darwin. Translated from the Ger-
man by W. S. Dallas. John Murray, London, 1869.
[Newman and M ̈uller, 2000]S. A. Newman and G. B. M ̈uller. Epigenetic mechanisms of char-
acter origination.J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol., 288: 304–317, 2000.
[Nyhart, 1995] L. K. Nyhart.Biology Takes Form. Animal Morphology and the German Uni-
versities, 1800-1900. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995.
[Oppenheimer, 1959]J. Oppenheimer. An embryological enigma in theOrigin of Species.InB.
Glass, O. Temkin, and W. L. Strauss Jr. (eds.),Forerunners of Darwin, 1745-1859, pages
292–322, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1959.
[Oppenheimer, 1967]J. Oppenheimer.Essays in the History of Embryology and Biology,MIT
Press, Cambridge, MA., 1967
[Osborn, 1902]H. F. Osborn. Homoplasy as a law of latent or potential homology.Amer. Natl.,
36: 259–271, 1902.
[Ospovat, 1976] D. Ospovat. The influence of Karl Ernst von Baer’s Embryology, 1825-1859: A
Reappraisal in Light of Richard Owen’s and William B. Carpenter’s ‘Palaeontological Appli-
cation of “Von Baer’s Law”’.J. Hist. Biol., 9: 1–28, 1976.
[Ospovat, 1995] D. Ospovat.The Development of Darwin’s Theory. Natural History, Natural
Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838-1859. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
[Owen, 1843]R. Owen.Lectures on Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Invertebrate
Animals, delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1843, Longman, Brown Green and
Longman, London, 1843.
[Owen, 1846]R. Owen. Report on the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton.
Report of thse sixteenth meeting of theBritish Association for the Advancement of Science,
pages 169–340, John Murray, London, 1846.
[Owen, 1848]R. Owen.On the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton. Richard
and John E. Taylor, London, 1848.