The Mathematics of Arbitrage

(Tina Meador) #1

264 13 The Banach Space of Workable Contingent Claims in Arbitrage Theory


Proof.Take a sequence of real numbers such thatan↘‖g‖.Foreachnwe
takeHnandKnmaximal andan-admissible such thatg=(Hn·S)∞−(Kn·
S)∞. From the Theorem 13.2.3 cited above we deduce that there are convex
combinationsVn∈conv{Hn,Hn+1,...}andWn∈conv{Kn,Kn+1,...}such
that (Vn·S)∞→hand (Wn·S)∞→k. Clearlyg=h−k,h≥−‖g‖
andk≥−‖g‖. However, at this stage we cannot assert thathand/orkare
maximal. Theorem 13.2.3 above, however, allows us to find a maximal strategy
Rsuch that (R·S)∞≥h≥−‖g‖.ThestrategyR−H^1 +K^1 is acceptable
and satisfies


((R−H^1 +K^1 )·S)∞=(R·S)∞−g≥h−g=k≥−‖g‖.

From the Proposition 13.2.13 above it follows thatU =R−H^1 +K^1 is
‖g‖-admissible and maximal. By definition ofU andRwe have thatg=
(R·S)∞−(U·S)∞. 


Corollary 13.3.14.With the notation of the above Theorem 13.3.13:(R·
S)∞+‖g‖≥g+and(U·S)∞+‖g‖≥g−. Hence we find


sup

{


EQ


[


g+

]


|Q∈M


}


≤‖g‖
sup

{


EQ


[


g−

]


|Q∈M


}


≤‖g‖.

Theorem 13.3.15.Suppose thatSis a locally bounded semi-martingale that
satisfies the (NFLVR) property. Ifg∈Gthen


‖g‖=sup

{


EQ


[


g+

]


|Q∈M


}


=sup

{


EQ


[


g+

]


|Q∈Me

}


=sup

{


EQ


[


g−

]


|Q∈M


}


=sup

{


EQ


[


g−

]


|Q∈Me

}


.


Proof.Putβ=sup{EQ[g+]|Q∈M}, where the random variablegis de-
composed asg=(H^1 ·S)∞−(H^2 ·S)∞withH^1 andH^2 maximal. From
Corollary 11.3.5 to Theorem 11.3.4, we recall that there is a maximal strategy
K^1 such thatg+≤β+(K^1 ·S)∞, implying thatK^1 isβ-admissible. The
strategyK^2 =K^1 −H^1 +H^2 is alsoβ-admissible and by Proposition 13.2.13
therefore maximal. SinceK^1 −K^2 =H^1 −H^2 we obtain that‖g‖≤β.Since
the opposite inequality is already shown in Corollary 13.3.14, we therefore
proved the theorem. 


Remark 13.3.16.IfQis a martingale measure for the process (H^1 −H^2 )·S,
then of courseEQ[g+]=EQ[g−]. But not all elements in the setMare
martingale measures for this process and hence the equality of the suprema
does not immediately follow from martingale considerations.


Theorem 13.3.17.Suppose thatSis a locally bounded semi-martingale that
satisfies the (NFLVR) property. The norm of the spaceGis also given by the
formula


2 ‖g‖=sup{EQ[|g|]|Q∈M}=sup{EQ[|g|]|Q∈Me}.
Free download pdf