Appendix 3.03 Survey of The Neurosciences
and Music III Conference 2008
Disorders and Plasticity
Title, Category
AimMus. Material, Cultural Ref.Technology & ProcedureMain focus of interestConclusion- Samson et al.
(245-255)Emotional power of music in memory disorders
Cat. 11: Disorder
Cat. 14: Memory
Cat. 19: Emotion- Peretz et al. (
256-265)Musical lexical networks
Cat. 13: Recognition
Cat. 14: Memory
36S. Akiva
-Kabiri et al.(266-269)
Music-length effect in tonalpitch memory
Cat. 14: Memory
37S. Gosselin et al.
(270
-272)
Impaired memory for pitch inamusia Cat. 11: Deficit Cat. 14: MemoryTo assess the influence of emotion on memory for music in 1)normal participants2) patients with intractable Temporal Lobe Epilepsy(TLE)3) patients withAlzheimer’s disease AD)
To identify the neural correlates of the major
processing components involved in the recognition of a familiar tune
To investigate the nature of musical working memory To assess the possibility that individuals suffering from congenital amusia have pitch memory deficitsRecorded music:
1 & 2) 28 nonfamiliar musical excerpts eliciting sadness, peacefulness, fear, and happiness. 3a) 3 popular
songs with lyrics, 3 excerpts of film music, 3 short stories.3b) 8 excerpts of film music, half ”happy”, half ”sad”, and 8 10-line poems. CR: Western,
Western popular Synthesized piano sound:
a) 28 familiar instrumental melodies, 8,5 sec.
b)28 unfamiliar melodies:
retrograde adaptations of the familiar melodies.
c)28 random sequences of
tones taken from the melodies
CR:Western
Pairs of isochronous tone
sequences in C major.(SNI)Four categories:
Short and slow, short and fast. Long and slow, long and fast.CR: Western
1) Twosingle tones separatedby a) a retention interval b) 6 distractor tones. 2) Two sequences of 1, 3, or 5 tones(SNI)
CR: Neutral1) 10 normal nonmusicians. Task: identify emotion by multiple-choice 2)8 patientssuffering from TLE, same task 3a) 6ADpatients: After 10exposure sessions, Task: ”Do you know this?”3b) 13newAD patients: After 8 exposure sessions, same task
9 women (Quebec) with little musical education.fMRIscanning of BOLD response to a) b) c), and silence in randomized order. After scanning, familiarity judgment task on a) mixed with b) in random order
8 subjects without musical training. Same / different task
9 amusics, 9 controls.
Same / different task2) Depth electrode recordings: Whether patients with medial TLE would present a deficit in recognizing emotionally arousing material.3) Whetherthefeeling of familiarity will be higher with musical than with verbal materials
Comparison of cerebral responses to familiar versus
unfamiliar music
Whether musical working memory can be explained by the classical explanation of the word lenght effect in theverbal domain
Interference and length effects on pitch retention accuracy2) Recognition of scary music wasimpaired in TLE patients.
3)Patients with AD, despite
their severe explicit memory and language difficulties, can createnew musicalrepresentations in conceptual memory
Comparing familiar music to unfamiliar music, we found focal and bilateral activation in the Superior Temporal Sulcus
(STS) with a right-hemispherebias. This region probably contains musical lexical networks
Recognition of musical information is affected by both number of items and rate of presentation. Long sequences are better recognized with faster presentation. Word lenght effect does not explain results
Amusics’ performance on both tasks impaired relative tocontrols. Results confirm the presence of a pitch memory problem in congenital amusia