Appendix 3.03 Survey of The Neurosciences
and Music III Conference 2008
Disorders and Plasticity
Title, Category
AimMus. Material, Cultural Ref.Technology & ProcedureMain focus of interestConclusion76S. Wigley et al.
(512-515)Motor timing and literacy
Cat. 4: Timing Cat. 6: LanguageTo investigate the relationship between a motor-rhythmicmeasure of ability (synchronous tapping) and purported linguistically processing measuresA steady beat presented at
~ 1,3 Hz (inter-stimulusinterval of 750 msec)(SNI)CR: Neutral88 kindergarten children, mean age ~ 4 years. Four individual testing sessions. Task after training: tapping insynchrony on a temple block.
Plus tests forRapid Automatized Naming (RAN) andPhonological Awareness (PA)Relationship betweentappingprecision and literacy precursor skills : Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Phonological Awareness (PA)Significant association betweensynchronous beattapping skill and RAN, which is associated with fluent reading ability.
No difference on the PA measurePart VIII. New Directions: Cochlear Implants(77-79)Title, CategoryAimMus. Material, Cultural Ref.Technology & ProcedureMain focus of interestConclusion77.Galvin et al.(518-533)Music Perception with Cochlear Implants
Cat. 11: Deficits
78.Trehub, Vongpaisal, andNakata(534-542)Children with Cochlear Implants
Cat. 11: DeficitsTo present experiments that directly measure Cochlear Implant (CI) users’ melodic pitch perception using a melodic contour identificaton (MCI) task
To present and discuss studies of music in the livesofdeaf children with cochlear implant (CI)Synthesized tones. 1) 9 Melo-
dic contours: 3-tone complex:fundamental (F0), 1st harmonic (F1), 2nd harmonic (F2).
2) Same melodic contours:
3-tone complex and spectral envelopes of 6 instruments.- Same melodic contours:
3target instruments: organ, violin, piano. Masker instrument: piano, ”flat” contour CR: Western
Recorded music:
a) Familiar songs in
1) original version
2) instrumental version
3) synthesized piano version
b) TV theme songs in 1) original version
2) Instrumental version3) synthesized flute versionCR: Western, Japanese1) 11 CI users, 9 Normalhearing (NH) subjects listened to randomly selected melodic contours. Task: Identify contour shape by button click.
2) 8 CI users, 8 NH subjects.Same test method as 1).
3) 7 CI users, 7 NH subjects.
Same test method. Task:
Identify contour shape of target instrument in thepresence of masker instrument.4) Training experiment
a & b) Summaries of tests comparing CI users with normal hearing (NH) subjects,and comparing child and adolescent CI users. Typical task: Identify the target song from choices depicted on a monitorBetter understanding of the effects of CI processing on music perception in order to improve the design of CI devicesand, in turn, toimprove CI users’ musicperception and appreciation CI users’ ability to identify songs in instrumental versions without words.
Differences between users who acquired CI as infants, and users who acquired CI later in life1)NH95 % correct, CI 53%correct. Large inter-subjectvariability.2) CI users’ MCIperformance was significantly affected by instrumental timbre: simple harmonic structure provides the best performance. 3) the presence of a competing instrument significantlyaffects performance. 4) A short period of training can improve melodic pitch perception.
Verbal cues are not critical for song identification by CI users.
Music is more engaging and memorable forchildren withCI than it is for adult CIusers.Limitations of current CItechnologydo not excluderewarding musical experiences, especially for children