142 CHAPTER 3. MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS
is closed. Hence it follows that there is aφ∈H^1 (M)such that
φk=
∂ φ
∂xk
for 1≤k≤n.
Assertion (2) is proved.
Now we prove Assertion (3). Taking the divergence on both sides of (3.3.26), we obtain
that
(3.3.32) DiDiφj=Diuij.
By the Laplace-Beltrami operator in (3.2.31),
(3.3.33) − ̃∆φj=DiDiφj+Rkjφk,
where ̃∆=δd+dδ. By the Hodge theory, forω=φidxiwe have
(3.3.34)
dω= 0 ⇔ φi=∂ φ/∂xi,
δ ω=∆φ ⇔ φi=∂ φ/∂xi.
Here∇is the gradient operator, and∆the Laplace operator as in (3.2.28). It follows from
(3.3.34) that
̃∆ω= (δd+dδ)ω=dδ ω ⇔φi=∂ φ/∂xi,
and
dδ ω=
∂
∂xi
(∆φ)dxi.
Hence we deduce from (3.3.33) that
(3.3.35) DiDjφj=−
∂
∂xj
(∆φ)−Rkj
∂ φ
∂xk
⇔ φi=∂ φ/∂xi.
Inserting (3.3.32) in (3.3.35) we obtain that the equations
∂
∂xj
(∆φ)+Rkj
∂ φ
∂xk
=−Diuij
have a solutionφif and only ifφjin (3.3.26) is a gradient field ofφ, i.e.φj=∂ φ/∂xj.
Assertion (3) is proven, and the proof of the theorem is complete.
Remark 3.21.The conclusions of Theorem3.20are also valid for second-order contra-
variant symmetric tensorsu={uij}, and the decomposition is given as follows:
uij=vij+gikgjlDkDlφ
Divij= 0 , vij=vji, φ∈H^2 (M).