(^) ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
- Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
Interpretation and analysis
The above table shows that work quality, work efficiency, understanding of work and
work patterns that have positive and direct relationship with each other. Similarly,
Sharing Knowledge through guiding colleagues has a direct and positive correlation with
training impact on changed work patterns, quality of work, efficiency at work and
Sig. (1-tailed) .270. .000 .010 .000 .184 .070 .292
(^) Training- N 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Impact-Work
Quality
Correlation Coefficient
.060 .436() 1.000 .418() .596() .000 .098 .418()
Sig. (1-tailed) .325 .000. .000 .000 .500 .230 .000
N 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Training-Impact-
Understanding-
Work
Correlation Coefficient
.170 .303() .418() 1.000 .364() .000 .110 .312()
Sig. (1-tailed) .099 .010 .000. .002 .500 .204 .008
(^) Training- N 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Impact-Increased
-Interest
Correlation Coefficient
.064 .491() .596() .364(*) 1.000 .000 .131 .276()
Sig. (1-tailed) .315 .000 .000 .002. .500 .162 .017
(^) Sharing- N 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Learning^ Sig. (1-Correlation Coefficient^ .254() .120 .000 .000 .000 1.000 -.108 .000^
tailed)N^ .026 59 .184 59 .500 59 .500 59 .500 59 59. .207 59 .500 59
Knowledge
Sharing-Guiding
Colleagues
Correlation Coefficient
.185 .195 .098 .110 .131 -.108 1.000 .249()
Sig. (1-tailed) .080 .070 .230 .204 .162 .207. .029
(^) Knowled N 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
ge Sharing-
Work Support
Correlation Coefficient
-.063 .073 .418() .312() .276() .000 .249() 1.000
Sig. (1-tailed) .319 .292 .000 .008 .017 .500 .029.
N 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59