36 3. Intermediate Determinant Theory
=
∑
rfrArj
δri+∑
sgsAis
δsj=fiAij
+gjAijwhich proves (D). The proof of (C) is similar but simpler.
Exercises
Prove that
1.
n
∑r=1n
∑s=1[rk
−(r−1)k
+sk
−(s−1)k
]arsArs
=2nk
.2.a′
ij=−
n
∑r=1n
∑s=1aisarj(Ars
)′
.3.
n
∑r=1n
∑s=1(fr+gs)aisarjArs
=(fi+gj)aij.Note that (2) and (3) can be obtained formally from (B) and (D), respec-
tively, by interchanging the symbolsaandAand either raising or lowering
all their parameters.
3.5 The Adjoint Determinant...................
3.5.1 Definition........................
The adjoint of a matrixA=[aij]nis denoted by adjAand is defined by
adjA=[Aji]n.The adjoint or adjugate or a determinantA=|aij|n= detAis denoted by
adjAand is defined by
adjA=|Aji|n=|Aij|n= det(adjA). (3.5.1)3.5.2 The Cauchy Identity
The following theorem due to Cauchy is valid for all determinants.
Theorem.
adjA=An− 1
.The proof is similar to that of the matrix relationAadjA=AI.