Benjamin Constant

(sharon) #1

  1. On this curious episode see Pierre Deguise, Benjamin Constant méconnu. Le Livre
    ‘De la Religion’, Geneva: Droz, 1966, pp. 89–115; Frank Paul Bowman, ‘L’épisode
    quiétiste dans Cécile’, in Benjamin Constant. Actes du congrès Benjamin Constant
    (Lausanne, octobre 1967), ed. Pierre Cordey et Jean-Luc Seylaz, op. cit., pp. 97–
    108; and Eugène Susini, Charles de Langalerie (1751–1835) et son entourage, Les
    Cahiers de Saint-Martin, vol. VI, 1987. The historical background to religious
    movements like the Lausanne Ames intérieures is given in Auguste Viatte’s standard
    work, Les Sources occultes du romantisme. Illuminisme—Théosophie 1770–1820,
    Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion, 1965, 2 vols. Vol. II contains a section on
    Constant (pp. 206–9).

  2. Cécile, ed. Paul Delbouille, pp. 216–24. It must be stressed that the account of
    events given in Cécile belongs to the fictional world of an autobiographical novel
    and is therefore less reliable as evidence than, say, the Journaux intimes or
    Constant’s correspondence. On the question of Constant’s ‘conversion’ in 1807, as
    Pierre Deguise neatly puts it (op. cit., p. 91), the various sources differ significantly:
    ‘Cécile says yes. The Journal intime is more vague, and Rosalie de Constant [in her
    correspondence] says no’.

  3. Constant, Œuvres, p. 656.

  4. Menos, p. 483.

  5. Constant, Œuvres, p. 665.

  6. Constant, Œuvres, pp. 665–6.

  7. On the composition and publication of Wallstein see the critical edition by Jean-
    René Derré, Wallstein. Tragédie en cinq actes et en vers de Benjamin Constant,
    Paris: Les Belles Lettres, [1965], esp. pp. 1–44.

  8. Constant, Œuvres, p. 664.

  9. Cécile, ed. Paul Delbouille, pp. 225–7.

  10. Constant, Œuvres, pp. 674 and 677.

  11. Cécile, ed. Paul Delbouille, p. 232.

  12. Menos, pp. 240–1.

  13. Wolfenbüttel, Niedersächsisches Staatsarchiv, MS 264 N II s. 12 Nr 23, ‘Papiers
    concernant le divorce de Mme de Constant [d’]avec M. du Tertre’, Extrait des
    Registres du Greffe de l’Officialité de Paris.

  14. The marriage certificate signed by Pastor Jean-Henry Ebray was added to the Von
    Marenholtz family papers already held at the Niedersächsisches Staatsar-chiv,
    Wolfenbüttel, in 1986 by Alexander Freiherr von Marenholtz-Nolde, together with a
    legal document on parchment dividing up Constant’s estate after his death, ‘Partage
    de la succession de M.Benjamin Constant’ dated Paris, 2 February 1831. Along with
    the marriage certificate there is another document, MS 264 N II s. 12 Nr 28,
    Document signé George Rouge Notaire public à Lausanne [certifying that the
    marriage certificate presented by Constant showing that he was married to Charlotte
    by ‘Monsieur Ebray de l’Eglise réformé[e]’on 5 June 1808 is genuine].

  15. A number of colloquia have taken place in recent years giving a long-overdue
    account of the wide variety of intellectual interests among the cosmopolitan
    membership of the Coppet Group from the late 1790s to Madame de Staël’s death,
    for example Le Groupe de Coppet. Actes et documents du deuxième Colloque de


List of abbreviations 302
Free download pdf