The Economist - UK (2022-04-16)

(Antfer) #1

36 The Economist April 16th 2022
China


Covid-19

Locked down, fed up


R


eading thenews backwards has long
been a useful skill in China, where offi­
cials  often  obfuscate.  Recently  it  has
seemed like a matter of survival for some.
Take  the  residents  of  Beijing,  the  capital,
who  are  girding  themselves  for  a  covid­19
lockdown and all the hardship that might
entail. When the city’s officials announced
on  April  11th  that  there  was  more  than
enough food for everyone, people assumed
the  opposite.  “Understood,  hurry  and  go
shopping now,” a cynic wrote online.
Beijing has fewer than 100 cases of the
virus.  There  are  no  clear  indications  of  a
growing outbreak or of an impending lock­
down.  But  residents  recall  the  experience
of  Shanghai,  where  local  officials  insisted
there  would  not  be  a  citywide  lockdown
right up to the moment they imposed one.
First they tried to lock down half of the city
at a time. Then they closed the whole place.
Residents who had trusted the authorities
quickly ran out of food. Now people in oth­
er  Chinese  cities  are  stockpiling  supplies,
determined not to make the same mistake.
China  shows  no  signs  of  loosening  its
zero­covid  approach,  which  uses  mass

testing and strict lockdowns to crush out­
breaks.  If  anything,  the  government  is
tightening its controls. A report by Gavekal
Dragonomics,  a  research  firm,  found  that
all but 13 of China’s top 100 cities (by gdp)
were implementing covid restrictions (see
chart  on  next  page).  Ten  cities  are  in  “se­
vere  lockdown”,  meaning  more  than  half
of  residents  are  confined  to  their  homes.
Changchun,  Xuzhou  and  Shanghai  were
recently  in  full  lockdown.  Shanghai  has
announced that areas with no cases for two
weeks will see restrictions lifted.
For much of the pandemic the Chinese
public has joined officials in hailing the ze­
ro­covid strategy as a success. Over the past
two years China has had a lower mortality
rate from the virus and stronger economic
growth than any other big country. During
a recent speech celebrating China’s hosting
of the Winter Olympics in February, Presi­

dent Xi Jinping claimed that some foreign
athletes said China deserved “a gold medal
for  responding  to  the  pandemic”.  Earlier
Mr Xi said the country’s anti­covid efforts
“demonstrate the advantages” of the Com­
munist Party’s leadership.
But  the  current  wave  is  changing  the
way  people  think  about  the  virus—and
about  the  government’s  strategy.  No  one
wants mainland China to end up like Hong
Kong,  which  was  overwhelmed  by  the
highly  transmissible  Omicron  variant,
leading to a spike in deaths among unvac­
cinated old people. The mainland’s elderly
population  is  similarly  vulnerable,  so  a
complete  lifting  of  controls  is  out  of  the
question.  At  the  moment,  though,  anec­
dotal  evidence  suggests  that  more  people
are  dying  because  of  the  Chinese  govern­
ment’s  restrictions  than  from  the  virus.
The state needs to adapt, say critics.
The  98­year­old  mother  of  Lang  Xian­
ping is one such victim. In a post on Weibo,
China’s  version  of  Twitter,  Mr  Lang  wrote
that she died of kidney failure after waiting
for hours at the entrance of an emergency
room,  unable  to  enter  without  a  negative
covid  test.  Mr  Lang,  meanwhile,  argued
with local officials until they let him out of
his sealed compound. When he was finally
released, there were no cars on the street to
take  him  to  the  hospital.  “I  did  not  get  to
see  my  mother  one  last  time,”  he  wrote.
“This tragedy could have been avoided.”
These  types  of  stories—tragic,  trou­
bling  and  widely  shared—are  growing
more common. And they are causing some

B EIJING
China’s zero-covid strategy is not changing. But the way people think about it is

→Alsointhissection
37 Englishfallsoutoffavour
38 Chaguan: China calls out its critics
Free download pdf