427
Didier EA, Brunson MW (2004) Adoption of range management innovations by Utah ranchers.
J Range Manag 57:330–336
DiEnno CM, Hilton SC (2005) High school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and levels of enjoy-
ment of an environmental education unit on nonnative plants. J Environ Educ 37:13–25
Dillemuth FP, Rietschier EA, Cronin JT (2009) Patch dynamics of a native grass in relation to the
spread of invasive smooth brome ( Bromus inermis ). Biol Invasions 11:1381–1391
DiTomaso JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci
48:255–265
Fernandez-Gimenez ME, LeFebre S, Conley A et al (2004) Collaborative stewardship of Arizona’s
rangelands: making a difference in resource management. Rangelands 26:24–30
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2011) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach.
Taylor & Francis, London
Germino MJ, Belnap J, Stark JM et al (2015a) Ecosystem impacts of exotic annual invaders in the
genus Bromus. In: Germino MJ, Chambers JC, Brown CS (eds) Exotic brome-grasses in arid
and semiarid ecosystems of the Western USA: causes, consequences, and management impli-
cations. Springer, New York, NY (Chapter 3)
Germino MJ, Chambers JC, Brown CS (2015b) Introduction: exotic annual Bromus in the Western
US. In: Germino MJ, Chambers JC, Brown CS (eds) Exotic brome-grasses in arid and semiarid
ecosystems of the Western USA: causes, consequences, and management implications.
Springer, New York, NY (Chapter 1)
Gordon R, Brunson MW, Shindler B (2014) Acceptance, acceptability and trust for sagebrush
restoration options in the Great Basin: a longitudinal response. Rangel Ecol Manag
67:573–583
Hershdorfer ME, Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Howery LD (2007) Key attributes infl uence the perfor-
mance of local weed management programs in the Southwest United States. Rangel Ecol
Manag 60:225–234
Jordan RC, Gray SA, Howe DV et al (2011) Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-
science programs. Conserv Biol 25:1148–1154
Kartchner H (2013) Development of ecologically-based invasive plant management curriculum for
university audiences. Thesis, Utah State University
Kelley WK, Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Brown CS (2013) Managing downy brome ( Bromus tecto-
rum ) in the Central Rockies: land manager perspectives. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:521–535
Larson DL, Anderson PJ, Newton W (2001) Alien plant invasion in mixed-grass prairie: effects of
vegetation type and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecol Appl 11:128–141
Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM et al (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global
consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710
Marler MJ, Supplee K, Wessner M et al (2005) Changing attitudes about grassland conservation in
Missoula, Montana – “Weed Capital of the West”. Ecol Restor 23:29–34
Marshall NA, Friedel M, van Klinken RD et al (2011) Considering the social dimensions of inva-
sive species: the case of buffel grass. Environ Sci Pol 14:327–338
McCaffrey S (2004) Fighting fi re with education: what is the best way to reach out to homeown-
ers? J For 102(5):12–19
Norgaard KM (2007) The politics of invasive weed management: gender, race, and risk perception
in northern California. Rural Sociol 72:450–477
Novak SJ, Mack RN (2001) Tracing plant introduction and spread: genetic evidence from Bromus
tectorum (cheatgrass). BioScience 51:114–122
Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N et al (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conserva-
tion practices by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric 46:1407–1424
Peters WL, Meyer MH, Anderson NO (2006) Minnesota horticultural industry survey on invasive
plants. Euphytica 148:75–86
Peterson R, Coppock DL (2001) Economics and demographics constrain investment in Utah pri-
vate lands. J Range Manag 45:106–114
Petty RE, Briñol P (2010) Attitude change. In: Baumeister RF, Finkel EJ (eds) Advanced social
psychology: the state of the science. Oxford University Press, London, pp 217–259
14 Human Dimensions of Invasive Grasses