278 Roberts
of the role of existentialism in postwar religious belief include Barbour, Issues in Science
and Religion, 119–21; and David E. Roberts, Existentialism and Religious Belief, ed. Roger
Hazelton (New York: Oxford University Press, 1957).- F. R. Tennant, Philosophical Theology, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1930), 2:1–2, 63; James Jeans, The Mysterious Universe, rev. ed. (1932; New York:
Macmillan, 1933), 186–87, 17–53, 175, 165. See also Henry P. Van Dusen, “Trends in
Contemporary Theism,” Religion in Life 1 (1932): 183–84. - Arthur F. Smethurst, Modern Science and Christian Beliefs (New York: Abingdon
Press, 1955), xvi–xvii, 71–72; William Grosvenor Pollard, Physicist and Christian: A
Dialogue Between the Communities (New York: Seabury Press, 1961), 54, 106–10; Barbour,
Issues in Science and Religion, 453–54. - Bernard Ramm, The Christian View of Science and Scripture (Grand Rapids,
MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1954), 33, 47, 76, 34–35, 37 (original
emphasis). - John C. Whitcomb Jr. and Henry M. Morris, The Genesis Flood: The Biblical
Record and Its Scientifi c Implications (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed Pub-
lishing Co., 1961), xx, 116–211 (quote, 119); Henry M. Morris and John C. Whitcomb
Jr., “Reply to Reviews,” Journal of the American Scientifi c Affi liation 16 (June 1964): 59.
For a more extended account of the work of Whitcomb and Morris, see Numbers, The
Creationists, 208–38. - Marshall Hall and Sandra Hall, quoted in Numbers, The Creationists, 274, cf.
268–69. See also Henry M. Morris and Gary E. Parker, What Is Creation Science? rev. ed.
(El Cajon, CA: Master Books, 1987), 9; Henry M. Morris, History of Modern Creationism
(San Diego, CA: Master Books, 1984), 24. - [William R. Overton], “McLean v. Arkansas: Opinion of William R. Overton,
U. S. District Judge, Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division (Dated 5 January
1982),” in Creationism, Science, and the Law: The Arkansas Case, ed. Marcel C. La Fol-
lette (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983), 68, 60, 58; Larry Laudan, “Commentary on
Ruse: Science at the Bar—Causes for Concern,” in La Follette, Creationism, Science, and
the Law, 161–66 (quote, 161): Wayne Frair and Gary D. Patterson, “Creationism: An
Inerrant Bible and Effective Science,” in Science & Christianity: Four Views, ed. Richard F.
Carlson (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000), 28–29. - J. P. Moreland, introduction to The Creation Hypothesis: Scientifi c Evidence for
an Intelligent Designer, ed. J. P. Moreland (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1994),
12–13; J. P. Moreland, “Theistic Science & Methodological Naturalism,” in The Creation
Hypothesis, 49; Stephen C. Meyer, “The Scientifi c Status of Intelligent Design: The
Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non- Naturalistic Origins Theories,” in
Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe: Paper Presented at a Conference Sponsored
by the Wethersfi eld Institute, New York City, September 25, 1999 (San Francisco: Ignatius
Press, 2000), 151–211; Yudhijit Bhattacharjee, “Kansas Gears Up for Another Battle
Over Teaching Evolution,” Science 308 (2005): 627. For a useful historical overview of
the intelligent design movement, see Numbers, The Creationists, 373–98. - Richard Lewontin, “Billions and Billions of Demons,” New York Review of Books,
January 9, 1997, 31. See also Steven Weinberg, The First Three Minutes: A Modern View
of the Origin of the Universe (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 154; Richard Dawkins, River
Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (New York: Basic Books, 1995), 132–33. See also