Table 4.26 Average increasable amount of Patents of DEA-inefficient units by university
location (NEAM)
Patents
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Means
East 13.092 34.698 14.005 11.804 9.506 16.621
JJJ 8.066 22.072 13.182 0.000 17.598 12.184
HSZ 16.344 48.021 19.903 11.480 5.768 20.303
Other 17.230 35.481 8.559 31.907 2.216 19.079
Central 0.248 55.815 28.318 36.616 71.674 38.534
West 2.568 14.036 22.216 35.652 51.676 25.229Table 4.27 Average increasable amount of EI Articles of DEA-inefficient units by university
location (NEAM)
EI articles
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Means
East 50.181 86.950 149.268 114.340 78.815 95.911
JJJ 58.244 128.220 130.721 51.940 80.312 89.887
HSZ 60.969 69.743 166.098 145.623 69.296 102.346
Other 24.334 60.974 159.180 176.629 87.556 101.735
Central 40.977 87.740 113.651 51.747 42.137 67.250
West 37.805 116.390 142.489 177.555 168.855 128.619Table 4.28 Average increasable amount of TOPESI of DEA-inefficient units by university
location (NEAM)
TOPESI
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Means
East 1.124 1.663 1.346 1.352 3.006 1.698
JJJ 1.647 1.758 1.880 1.735 3.106 2.025
HSZ 0.237 1.624 1.068 1.080 3.283 1.458
Other 1.351 1.602 0.823 1.076 2.547 1.480
Central 0.326 0.860 0.748 0.413 2.004 0.870
West 0.448 0.758 1.468 1.950 1.172 1.159Table 4.29 Average increasable amount of Monographs of DEA-inefficient units by university
location (NEAM)
Monographs
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Means
East 1.385 1.855 2.374 2.935 2.239 2.158
JJJ 1.990 1.410 1.855 2.600 0.141 1.599
HSZ 0.709 3.247 3.203 3.337 4.803 3.060
Other 1.228 1.061 2.243 2.957 2.306 1.959
Central 0.862 2.943 1.573 2.017 2.372 1.953
West 2.620 1.764 1.314 2.475 0.979 1.830142 4 Evaluation on Research Efficiency of 211Us: The DEA Approach