Computational Drug Discovery and Design

(backadmin) #1

  1. Why Cyscore has no term for charge-charge interaction
    between protein and ligand?
    Charge–charge interaction may play a critical role in some
    of protein–ligand interaction. However, its net effect on bind-
    ing affinity is very complicated and pH-dependent. Cyscore
    ignores this term.

  2. How do the programs do with HETATM records in PDB file?
    Programs in Cyscore package ignore the HETATM records
    in PDB file. If the head markers of “HETATM” are replaced by
    “ATOM,” they will be taken into account.

  3. Can I use other programs to add hydrogen atoms to the
    protein?
    Yes. Cyscore supports any protein file in standard PDB
    format.

  4. What is RotaBond used for?
    RotaBond is used for estimating entropy loss of ligand in
    binding process in Cyscore. In other cases, it is used in lead-like
    compounds screening. For example, lead-like compounds fol-
    low some experience-based rules, such as the rule of three
    (RO3), which restricts the number of rotatable bonds.

  5. Does Cyscore work on Windows system?
    Current Cyscore package works on Linux. The Windows
    version will be released in future.


Acknowledgments


We gratefully thank Dr. Shuang Chen for the help with critical
editing of the manuscript. The work was supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (#31401130 to Y.C).

References



  1. Glaab E (2016) Building a virtual ligand
    screening pipeline using free software: a survey.
    Brief Bioinform 17(2):352–366

  2. Sousa SF, Ribeiro AJ, Coimbra JT, Neves RP,
    Martins SA, Moorthy NS, Fernandes PA,
    Ramos MJ (2013) Protein-ligand docking in
    the new millennium--a retrospective of
    10 years in the field. Curr Med Chem 20
    (18):2296–2314

  3. Blundell TL (1996) Structure-based drug
    design. Nature 384(6604 Suppl):23–26

  4. Grinter SZ, Zou X (2014) Challenges, applica-
    tions, and recent advances of protein-ligand
    docking in structure-based drug design. Mole-
    cules 19(7):10150–10176
    5. Forli S, Huey R, Pique ME, Sanner MF, Good-
    sell DS, Olson AJ (2016) Computational
    protein-ligand docking and virtual drug
    screening with the AutoDock suite. Nat Protoc
    11(5):905–919
    6. Li H, Leung KS, Ballester PJ, Wong MH
    (2014) istar: a web platform for large-scale
    protein-ligand docking. PLoS One 9(1):
    e85678
    7. Allen WJ, Balius TE, Mukherjee S, Brozell SR,
    Moustakas DT, Lang PT, Case DA, Kuntz ID,
    Rizzo RC (2015) DOCK 6: impact of new
    features and current docking performance. J
    Comput Chem 36(15):1132–1156
    8. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina:
    improving the speed and accuracy of docking


242 Yang Cao et al.

Free download pdf