with a new scoring function, efficient optimiza-
tion, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31
(2):455–461
- Wang C, Zhang Y (2017) Improving scoring-
docking-screening powers of protein-ligand
scoring functions using random forest. J Com-
put Chem 38(3):169–177
- Danishuddin M, Khan AU (2015) Structure
based virtual screening to discover putative
drug candidates: necessary considerations and
successful case studies. Methods 71:135–145
- Li C, Wang Z, Cao Y, Wang L, Ji J, Chen Z,
Deng T, Jiang T, Cheng G, Qin FX-F (2017)
Screening for novel small-molecule inhibitors
targeting the assembly of influenza virus poly-
merase complex by a bimolecular luminescence
complementation-based reporter system. J
Virol 91:e02282-16
- Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996)
VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol
Graph 14(1):33–38
- Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC,
Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin
TE (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization sys-
tem for exploratory research and analysis. J
Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612
- Pencheva T, Soumana OS, Pajeva I, Miteva MA
(2010) Post-docking virtual screening of
diverse binding pockets: comparative study
using DOCK, AMMOS, X-Score and FRED
scoring functions. Eur J Med Chem 45
(6):2622–2628
- Cao Y, Li L (2014) Improved protein-ligand
binding affinity prediction by using a
curvature-dependent surface-area model. Bio-
informatics 30(12):1674–1680
- Velec HF, Gohlke H, Klebe G (2005) Drug-
Score(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring func-
tion derived from small molecule crystal data
with superior recognition rate of near-native
ligand poses and better affinity prediction. J
Med Chem 48(20):6296–6303
- Grinter SZ, Yan C, Huang SY, Jiang L, Zou X
(2013) Automated large-scale file preparation,
docking, and scoring: evaluation of ITScore
and STScore using the 2012 community
structure-activity resource benchmark. J
Chem Inf Model 53(8):1905–1914
- Wang R, Lai L, Wang S (2002) Further devel-
opment and validation of empirical scoring
functions for structure-based binding affinity
prediction. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16
(1):11–26
- Li H, Leung KS, Wong MH, Ballester PJ
(2014) Substituting random forest for multiple
linear regression improves binding affinity
prediction of scoring functions: Cyscore as a
case study. BMC Bioinformatics 15:291
- Huang SY, Zou X (2010) Inclusion of solva-
tion and entropy in the knowledge-based scor-
ing function for protein-ligand interactions. J
Chem Inf Model 50(2):262–273
- Wang R, Lu Y, Fang X, Wang S (2004) An
extensive test of 14 scoring functions using
the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand
complexes. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44
(6):2114–2125
- Jackson MB (2016) The hydrophobic effect in
solute partitioning and interfacial tension. Sci
Rep 6:19265
- Ball P (2008) Water as an active constituent in
cell biology. Chem Rev 108(1):74–108
- Chandler D (2005) Interfaces and the driving
force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437
(7059):640–647
- Tanford C (1979) Interfacial free energy and
the hydrophobic effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A 76(9):4175–4176
- Tolman RC (1949) The effect of droplet size
on surface tension. J Chem Phys 3(17):5
- Nicholls A, Sharp KA, Honig B (1991) Protein
folding and association: insights from the inter-
facial and thermodynamic properties of hydro-
carbons. Proteins 11(4):281–296
- Sharp KA, Nicholls A, Fine RF, Honig B
(1991) Reconciling the magnitude of the
microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic
effects. Science 252(5002):106–109
- Bohm HJ (1994) The development of a simple
empirical scoring function to estimate the
binding constant for a protein-ligand complex
of known three-dimensional structure. J Com-
put Aided Mol Des 8(3):243–256
- Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren
TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, Repasky MP, Knoll
EH, Shelley M, Perry JK, Shaw DE, Francis P,
Shenkin PS (2004) Glide: a new approach for
rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method
and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med
Chem 47(7):1739–1749
- Salaniwal S, Manas ES, Alvarez JC, Unwalla RJ
(2007) Critical evaluation of methods to incor-
porate entropy loss upon binding in high-
throughput docking. Proteins 66(2):422–435
- Vanommeslaeghe K, Hatcher E, Acharya C,
Kundu S, Zhong S, Shim J, Darian E,
Guvench O, Lopes P, Vorobyov I, Mackerell
AD Jr (2010) CHARMM general force field: a
force field for drug-like molecules compatible
with the CHARMM all-atom additive
biological force fields. J Comput Chem 31
(4):671–690
Protein-Ligand Docking by Cyscore 243
