68
Sally
McAru
she
imagined
Australian
countryside
should
be,
constitutingvery
visibleevidence
at
aloss
ot'a
familiar.localsense
ofplace.
aloss
ofground
to
somethingforeign.
Thisisconsistent
withFriedman’s
suggestion
that
Hage
couldhave
given
more
consierationto
classrelations
between
cosmopolitans.
who
identify
withmulti-
culturalism,
and
downwardly
mobile
and
workingclasses,
whodonot.Friedman
suggests
that‘the
xenophobia
of
the
powerless'.
rather
than
being
about
losing
controlofthe
nation.isconcerned
with
losing
‘controlover local
sociality.
a
feeling
ofhomclessncss‘
(200i):
269).
The-Stupa
objectors' comments.while muted in
comparison
to
objections
to
similarlyprominent nomChristian
religious
edifices elsewhereinAustralia
(see
Dunn et al.
2001;
McAm
2009:
chapter 6),
are
significant
because.
as
noted.
Anglo-Celtic
Australian
opposition
to
immigrants‘
alterationsofthebuilt
environment
has
oftenbeen
stridentand
provoked
much
public
debate.Forsome
itisa
disruption
totheirsense
of
place.
a
sign
ot‘
the declineor
AngltFCL‘iliC
Australian
culture
or
ofChristianity
orawasteof
money
inthefaceofothermore
pressing
socialor
environmental
issues.The
objectors’
criticismofthe
stupa
hints
atthe
backlash
againstmulticulturalismthat
Hage
identifieswithwhiteAustralian
victimswhofeara
‘conspiracy
to
change
the
very
natureof
the
country'(Hage
1998:
20).
These
conservativewhite
Australiansresentthe
apparent
erosion
of
their
familiar,
‘traditional‘
Australian
way
of
life. Their
discourse
ofbacklash
blames
immigrants
from
non-European/non-English-speaking backgrounds
for
much
ofthis
change.
Putting
Bendigo
onthe
world
map
The
Bendigonians
who
engage
in
TibetanBuddhist
practice.
orare
sympathetically
disposedtowardsit.tendtobe
sympathetic
towards
multiculturalism.
aspirng
toseetheir
city
becomemore
culturallydiverse.
perhaps
asa
way
of
marking
themselves
asa
significant
city
ratherthana
largecountry
town.
For
example.
in
explaining
the
stupa
inmedia
interviews.
[an
says:
‘Welivein
Australia
which
is
a
multicultuial
nationandbecausewe‘re
establishing
Australian
Buddhism
so
to
speak
it‘s
veryappropriate
thatitshouldbea
multiculturalformofBuddhism'
(Nexus.n.d.).
Heis
speaking
thesame
language
as
Rivendell.
here
refen'ing
to
how
the
stupa
hasfound
suppon
withtheAustralian
Vietnamese
community
and
further
afieldin
Malaysia.Singapore,
Taiwanand
Thailand,
withtheintention
of
highlighting
thatthe
stupa
is
compatible
withand indeed
acontributiontoa
multicultural
society,
Asin
Mayor
Rivendell‘s
speech,othcial
positions
onthe
stupa
reiterate
the
dominant
governmental
discourses
ofAustrtiliaasatolerant.multicultural
society.
occasionallyexpressingpride
in
Bendigo
asa
city
viithadistinctidentity. For
the
city's
elites.the
stupa‘s
exoticismisan
important
contributiontoliendieo‘s
cultural
capital.
Asasmallbut
growingregional
city,Bendigo
aspires
to
develop
its
image
asadiverseand
livelyplace.
Ina
speechquoted
in
Charlen.Maurice
Sharkey,
anearlier
mayor
of
Bendigo.spoke
aboutthe
project
as
somethingthat
bolsters‘a
community
like
Bendigo'.
Headded:
‘[W]e
do
ourselvesno
favotirshv
_
BuddhifvingAur/mlia
69
thinking
small Wecanachieve
bigthings.‘
His
speech
alsotakes
ownership
of
this
project
asashowot‘
strength
forthe
city
of
Bendigo.
tofosterasense
ot‘pridc
inthe
city
andthe
capacities
ofthe
community(asmayors
are
expected
to
do).
\ihile
its
reproduction
inCharter:
highlights
the
project‘s
endorsement
from
city
elite
Bendigo's
elitcs
attempt.throughsupporting
the
Stupa.
tofoster
asenseof
their
city’s
ownlocaldistinctiveness.in
pan
toattracttottristvisitsand
revenue
andin
pan
tobolstertheirownsenseof
cosmopolitanism
andmulticulturalism.
Butthisishow
mayors
talk.Whatofthewider
Bendigopublic?
AsImet
people
inthecourseof
living
in
Bendigo
in
2003,
Iasked
what
they
thought
aboutthe
stupa.
Somehadnotheardaboutit.
butwhenIshowed
them
the
project‘s
brochure.
themostcommon
response
waseithermild
incredulity
attheambitiousness
andunusualnessofthe
project
oran
expression
(it'antici-
pation
thatit
would
provide
avaluabletourist
attraction.For
instance.
awoman
Imetonthe
Bendigo
toMelbournetrainexclaimed:
‘Whata
coup
for
Bendigo!‘
Others,
likethe
objectors.
feltthatitwould
be
incompatible
with
what
they
understoodto
bethecharacterofthe
region.
One
elderly
Methodist
womanI
metwhile
waiting
atthe
Bendigorailway
stationhadheardofAtisha
Centre
becauseher
goddaughtcr
attendedthe
Sunday
meditations.Shewasnonetheless
surprised
when
Ishowedhera
picture
ofthe
Gyantscstupa
andsheexclaimed:
‘Goodness.
it'lllooknbit
funnysticking
out
ofthebush!‘
Perhaps
in
anticipation
ofsuchcomments.
the
stupapublicity
asserts
thatitis
compatible
withthe
region's
cultural
history
bylinking
theTibetan structttre
to
the
region‘s
Chinese
history,rioting:
‘Buddhism
isnorecentvisitorto
Bendigo.
It
first
came
inthe 18505 withtheChinese
gold
diggers‘
(Great
Stupa
of
Universal
Compassion
brochuren.d..
n.p.).
This
appeal
to
Bendigo’s
Chinese
heritage
is
interesting,
given
thesad
history
ofChineserTibetan
relations.the
very
different
religious
practices
and sociocultural
statusoftheChinese
golddiggers
and the
very
different
path
thatTibetanBuddhism
hastakentoAustralia.
Despite
allof
this.
the
alignment
makes sense
intermsofthe
city's
economic
development
becauseoneofthe
primary
tourist
attractionsin
Bendigotoday
isits
goldmining
heritage.
ofwhichtheChinese
connectionisone
importantpart.
The
city's
Golden
Dragon
MuseumandlossHouse
provide
year-round
attrac-
tions,
whilethe
highlight
of
Bendigo‘s
annual Easter
festivalisChinese
dragon
andlion
dancingperformed
by
local
troupes.
TheGolden
Dragon
Museum
plans
tobuilda 50
metre-high(nine-storey)pagoda.
anEastAsian
style
towerthat
constitutesavariant
formof
stupa.
Themuseum
website
represents
thestructure
asanenhancement
ofthe
existing
institution
thatwillhouse
displays
onthearts
andctafisof
thevariousChinese
dynasties
witha
revolving
restaurantatthe
top.
It
is
significant
that
Bendigo
couldbecome
hometonotonebuttwoBuddhist
monuments
thatare
justified
intermsof
their
potential
astouristattractionsand
linked
withthe
region‘shistory
ofChinese
connections.LetterstotheAdverliser.
from
2003—2008.
indicatea
positivepublic
response
tothis
plan
becauseofthe
perceived
benefits intermsoftourism
to the
city.
For
example,
inhis
letter,
McKenzie
expresses
a
strongpreference
forthe
pagoda
and
stupaprojects
overa
proposal
to
spend
$500,000
ona
sculpture
inthe
city‘s
mall
(2008).
He
suggests