70Sal/yMcAruthepagoda
andstupawillbeabetterwayto‘putBendigo
ontheworldmap'
and‘leavealegacy
forfuturegenerations‘by
attractinginternationaltourists.Thestupaprojcct
isanunusualexample
ofchanges
toAustralia'sreligious
landscape
becauseitbrings
anunfamiliar
architecturalstyle
asimmigrantreligious
minorities
sometimes
do,butin thiscase
its mainproponentsarethemselvespartofthe
ethnicmajority.
Further,manyAustralianFPMTmembersbelong
toprofessional/managerial
classes in which
these white multicultumlists. theconsumers
at thecentre ofthediscourse
of
multiculturalism,arefound. [hispositioninggave
themaparticular
advantageintheformofanaccumulationofsocialcapital
innegotiations
withthe
widersocietyduring
theplanningappli~
cationphase.
At thesame
time.Tibetan Buddhismhas.amongcertainliberal.middle»classsectorsinternationally,acquired
acertain chic
(see,forexample.
Lopez
1999:Congdon2007)
thatgives
itculturalcapital
inthecontextofpublic
negotiations
aroundthestupa.atleastamongthosewhobelong
tothedemographic
inwhich
Buddhismhasapositivepublic
image.lndeed.themajority
ofTibetanBuddhism‘s
newwestemadherentsandsympathizers
comefromtheverysamemostly tertiary-educated.
professionalmiddleandupperclasseswhoaremostlikelytopanicipate
inorinfluencecitycouncil
decisions.Bendigocity
councillorsandothersinleadership
roleswouldliketheircitytohemoreprosperous.morecosmopolitan
andmoremulticultural.Further.somewhilecosmopolites
findcertainexpressions
ofBuddhism
attractive.for
instance,appreciating
theaestheticqualitiesof
Buddhist
art,orbecoming
whatTweedcalls‘Buddhistsympathizers'
whoread
booksonBuddhistteachings
withoutcontact»ithdhanna
teachersororganiIationst
l
999).Thisbrings
metoafurthertomofculturalcapital
involvedinthestupaproject.
Tibetan Buddhism‘sattractivenessamongcertain
sectorsofupper—andmiddle—classAnglo-Australiansociety
worksinfavourofthestupa.InAustralia,thesamepeople
whoadvocatemulticulturalismalsospeak
aboutBuddhism
inpositiveterms.Theirdiscoursestressesreligious
andintercultural
tolerance,varying
from‘Buddhismiswelcomebecauseitisapeaceful
rcligion'.to‘Buddhismislessthreatening
thanlslam'.Bywayofexample.
inMay2003 iattendedtheBuddhistSociety
of
Victoria's50thAnniversary
celebrationatBox
HillTownHallin
Melbourne.an
occasionthatillustratedhowpeople
linktheconceptsof
multiculturalism.toleranceand
Buddhismasapeacefulreligion.
For
instance,onestatememberofparliament.
ChristopherStrong.saidthatnewimmigrantsin
Victoriahave‘enrichedourlive.‘sing
theclassic
discourseofenrichment,
‘ourlives‘refers.asHage
wouldsay.tothewhiteAustralians
atthecentre.Strong
characterized
Buddhismas ‘notaggressive.
exclusive.andintolerantofotherfaiths‘stating
further
that‘wecan'talTordfaithsthatareintol-erantof
others'.Atthesame
event,
AjahnBrahmavamso.anEnglish
Buddhistmonkordainedin
theThaiForestSangha
tmditionandabbotofzmonasterynearPerth,saidthatthere‘has
neverbeenawarfought
inthenameof
Buddhism',8key
refrainthatBuddhistsand
Buddhistsympathizers
useoften.Similarly.inBendigo,
RodFyt'e
(the
Bendigomayorin2003)told
methatthestuparepre-sentedpeaceandcompassion
andthiswasmoreimportant
tohimpersonallythanthe
economicbenefits.Underlyingsuchrepresentations
areimplicit
comparisonsr?—
Buddhr'fying
Atlslru/r'rr7 l
withstereotypesaboutIslamicfundamentalism‘sviolence.Thisdiscourse
says.‘Buddhismispeaceful”,giving
thestupaproject
moresymboliccapital
thanamosque.becauseitrepresents
Buddhismasmorecompatible
with‘Ausiralian'valuesoftolerancethanthepurportedly
fanaticalIslam.Thesewaysofthinkingandtalking
abouttheproject
asbeneficialtoBendigo
areeffectiveincircleswherethereligious
discoursesofthepowerot'the
holyobjectarenot,MulticulturalcapitalAtthesametimeasthestupaproponentspossesscertainadvantages
through
theirmembership
ofthedominantethnicgroup.theirproject
alsobenefitsfromTibetanBuddhism‘sreligiousminority
statusinAustralia. [hisisadeployment
of‘multiculturalcapital‘thathelps
to renderthestupamoreintelligibleandacceptable
intheregion.
Inthisidonotmeanthat
anyparticularmanipulationisinvolved.Rather,
thepoint
IwishtomakeisthatthebuddhifieutionofAustraliadepends
onmorethanthemissionaryimpetus
oitheconvertsandtheirteachers;italsodepends
ontheextenttowhichtheproject's
proponentsparticipate
inandalign
themselveswithhegemonic
discoursesaboutBuddhismandaboutculturaldiversity.Mayor
Rivendell'sspeech,
whichmaintainsthattheproject
fitswiththecity'scommunityplan.
demonstratesthealignment.
A
further.relatedpointpertains
tothestup'sappearance.Despite
the twoobjections
cited
earlier.thealleged
‘inconipaiibility'ofthestupaproject
wiihAits
niral
Victoriansetting
isitselt‘a factorinaccruingsupport.
BoththeNailTientemple
thatWaindiscus.sinthisvolumeandthestupaproject
benefitfromthefactthat
theircitycouncils,inlinewithgovernmental
discoursesofmulticultur—:ilism.nowregard
cultural
diversityasenrichinginbothculturalandeconomicterms.Having
thisstructureasalocallandmarkcontributestoattemptstomarketBendigo
asaculturallydiverse.vibrantplace.
Thediscourseofculturalenrichmentrepresentsthestupanotonlyasasignificant
touristattraction.butalsosomething
thatwillhelp
thecity
tobecomemoremulticulturaland
cosmopolitan.bringingthepeaceful
exoticismofTibetanBuddhismtoBendigo
without(lo-centeringexisting
potterrelations.NotesI This
chapter
isbasedonresearchthattundertookbetween 2003andincludingsixmonthsof
residenceinBendigo.My
methodsentailed
participantobservationandtheuseoisourccssuchas
tnlcl’Vlcws,informalconversationsandletterstothelocalnewspaper,
TheTaiwanese»basedFokuangshan's
NariTien
templeinWollongong,NSW(Want.
thisvolume),
ispromoted
as'thelargest
Buddhist
templeinthesouthernhemisphere
(Ralalntemational
[995).
Despitesome
opposition.thetempleplans
wonfavourwiththeWollongongcity
councilbecause,asWaitt
suggests.localgovernmentalready
wishedtorcbrandtheircityasculturallydiverseand
vital.toattractvisitorsandtheirmoneytotheregion.
3
Flitcsrefersheretothe
peopleinleadership
roleswhoseposition
empowerstheminmakecrucial
decisionsaboutsociety
(Shore2002:
4).Theiraccesstovariousformsofcapital
enablesthemtogain
andmaintainsuch
positioning.to