76 GordonWait!Whilesocialdiversity
wasunquestionably
a
characteristicofurbanWollongong.
thesocialcomposition
ofBerkeley
remainedrelatively
homogeneous.Furthermore.in
thecontext ofdebutregarding
Asianimmigrationduring
the
mid—19905,analysis
ofregional
variationsof
ethnocentrism in NewSouthWalessuggested
heightenedracismwithin theregion.
theIllawarra(DunnandMacDonaldZOOI).
Vilificationofminority
groupsinWollongong
wasperhaps
elevatedby
highlevelofunemployment
because
ofstructuralchanges
tothecoalandsteel-basedregionaleconomy(Vasta
and
Castles
1996).Whentheplanningprocessesinllinning
the
decisionstoincludeandexcludeanethnicminority
religion‘splaceofworshipareconsidered,
Wollongongbecomesperhaps
aless
remarkablelocationforaBuddhisttemple.Throughout
the
I9805.severalSydney
municipalCouncilsdeployed
townplanning
andbuilding
codestodiscriminateagainst
thepractice
ofminority
religions particularlyHinduism.Islamand
Buddhism. In I990theEthnicAffairs
Commission‘sAnnualReport
concludedthat:[O]verthepast
tenyears, minority religions
especiallyethnicminorityreligionshave
foundthemselvesatthecentreofmajorlegal
battlesaswellascommunityconflictsovertheirright
topursue
developmentsofplaces
ofworship
andreligious
instructionasisrequiredby
theirvariousdoctrines.(EthnicAffairsCommission1990:
I7]The
difiieultiesenduredbyreligious
minoritiesoversecuringplanningpermis-
sions
culminatedinaninterdepartmental
investigation(EthnicAffairsCommissionofNew South
Wales
1991).Dunndemonstrated how
discoursesofIslam as‘fanatical‘and‘intolerant‘
faithheightened
uneaseand
widenedopposition
totheconstmctionofmosquesin
certainSydney
suburbs(ZOOI:29]).
Localauthoritiesrefusedplanningpermission
formosquesonthegrounds
thattheproposals
wereout
of‘character'withthelocalneighbourhood
(BoumaI992:
52;
MurphyandWatsonI997:
28).In
contrast.Wollongong City
Council. under theleadership
ofthe LordMayorFrank
Arkell0974—1991)
withhiscatchery
‘WonderfulWollongong'.
hadchampioned
minorityrcligions'places
ofworship.Forinstance.during
the198thplanningconsentwasgiven
tobuilding
aHindutemple
nearHelensburgh.
Culturaldiversitywasseemingly
embracedasapotential
mechanismtosignifyvitalitytopotential
investorsinwhatwasincreasingly
adepressed
localeconomy.Inthe l9905NanTienTemple
providedanotheropportunityforWollongong
CityCouncil to revitalize the localeconomy along
‘culturalcapital'lines(where
‘symbolic'consumption practices provideabasis forcapital
accumu-lation
ratherthanproduction)Throughout
the
I9805internationalcompetitionandtheassociatedprocessofdeindustrializationseverelydamagedWollongong's
economicbaseofcoalminingandsteelmaking.
Closureof
coalminesandmassivejoblossassociatedwiththerestructuring
ofthesteelworkshadfarreaching
effectsthroughout
the localeconomy.
generatinglong-termstructuralunemployment.
Higherthannationalaverageunemployment
ratesthencombinedwithnegative
—g—
_—
LocatingaBuddhisttemple
inWit/Itmgang
77portrayals
inSydney‘sprint
media.whichwroteatlength
aboutthe‘SteelCity's‘pollution,unemployment
and
crime.tosustainagrim.ugly.
‘rust-town'place
image.
Suchwasthenegativeplace
image
thatAustraliancomediansridiculedWollongong
asa‘nowhere‘place.
In l984theplace
name
‘Wollongong'wassotarnishedthatllaroldllanson.thenchairoftheLeisureandTouristAsso ationlunsuccessfullyproposed
thatthecityshouldchange
itsnameto
‘lllawarra‘.alterthesurroundingregion.
Sincethe l98tls. ratherthan anamechange.
the
WollongongCit)(‘ouncilranaseriesofplacepromotion
campaigns.
Thefirstcentredontheslogan,
‘theLeisure
Coast‘.the mostrecent,‘theCityofInnovation‘.‘TheLeisure Coast'strategy
was toreinvent
WollongongasSydney'splayground.
Thecampaign
camereplete
withimages
ofoutdoorrecreationandadventuresportssetagainst
abackdrop
ofrainforests.beachesandwaterfalls.However.intheplacewars'oversharing
thedomestictouristandleisuremarket
dollar.thelackofaunique.
‘must-see‘attractionhandicapped
Wollongong.Securing
NanTienTemple
wouldcomplementWollongong City
Council‘sobjective
of
teAimagingthecityandrestnrcturing
the local economicbase within the service sector.
panicularlytourism.Thenextsectionexaminesthediscoursesofthel’oKuungShuniiithechoicetolocateNariTien
TempleinWollongong.FaKuangShan.
geomancyandNanTienTemple
faithandgeomancyarecrucialtoexplainwhy
aTaiwaneseBuddhistsectwouldconsiderAustralia.
yetaloneWollongong.asasuitablesiteforatemplecomplex.
According
totheBuddhistfaith.constructing
atemplecomplex
isas)nibolol'thedevotionofthepersonwhoerected
it.ameansby
whichthey
canaccumulatethemeritsneededforachieving
finalenlightenment.
Inthelatel9805theFir
KuangShah‘sGrand Masterl~Ising
Yunwascontemplatingconstructing
anAustraliantemple
tofulfilhisobjective
topropagatethedharmaglobally.complementing
monasteriesandtemples
in 26 othercountriesincludingCanada.ItongKong.
Malaysia.
thePhilippinesandtheUnitedStates.ItisbelievedthatGrandMasterl-Ismg
YunfirstlearntaboutWollongongwhencanvassedinTaiwanby
ChristineYuen.aVietnameseaAustraliun fromthe lllawarra. about thepossibilitiesofbuilding
atemple
inWollongong.
Thelocalresidentpraised
theregion's
beauty
andproximitytoSydney.
Early
in 1989 GrandMaster
llsingYunvisitedWollongong
andtheproposed
Flagstaff
Hill site.Thiswasafavourablelocationaccording
tothetimerspace
’surface'ofthet‘engshiiidnflutnced
worldview.Atengshui
worldviewidentifiedflowsofcosmicenergyknownasqi,
leatherandChow
(2000:Jillnotethatthesetofideasunderpinning
fengshui
arean‘attempttomanipulate
the
future.by
organisingone‘suseoftimeandspaceinordertofitthepatterning
oftheuniverse'.Thenonh-facingrelationship
ofFlagstaffHillwithMountKeiraandMount
Kernblawasanimportant
geomantic
selectionfactor
(Park1994:247).
Inthe
caseofNanTienTemple.
theReverendManSingexplained
thatinChinesethinking
thetemples
locationinrespecttothetopographyrepresented
a
chair.