2Locatinga
BuddhisttempleinWollongong,New South WalesGordon Wait!Theaimot’thischapter
isto
examinewhy
thelargest
Buddhisttemple
inthesottthemhemisphere(Nan
TienTemple
,
ParadiseoftheSouthemHemisphere)
islocatedinWollongong,
New
South
Wales.acitybuiltonaheavyindustrylegacy
ofcoalminingandsteelmaking.
ThechoiceofWollongongmay.
therefore.seemquite
remarkableat
first,adecision
whichbecomesevenmoreastonishing
whenconsidering
thesmallnumbersthatcomprised
theresidentBuddhistcommunitySimilarly.
the site.in thesuburbofBerkeley,appears equallypuzzlinggiven
Itsproximity
to
afreeway.
industrial
estatesandresidentialsuburbs.Anexpla—
nationforthis
locationpu711c
issought
within
thediscoursesofthealdemrenofWollongongCity
Council.theChristianministriesandthe
[ToKuang
Shan.inhelp
explore
thelocationof
NanTienTemple
intheWollongong
suburbofBerkeley,
datawere
collectedfromarangeofsourcesthroughparticipatory
observation.interviews
withkey
informantsandthecollectionoftextsofferingrepresenta-tions
ofthetemple including:
newspaperarticles. the lntemationat BuddhistAssociation‘snewslettersandWollongongCity
Councildocuments.Discoursesidentified
asmostcriticaltoinforming
thedecision
tolocatethetemple
inBerkeley
werethosepertaining
togeomancy.multiculturalism.faithandtourisrnmarketing.
Thechapter
has
fivesections.Thefirstsection
introduces NanTienTemple
andWollongong.
The
secondsectionthenexplores
whyaTaiwaneseBuddhistsect
wouldevenconsiderlocatingatemple
inaregional
AustraliancityWithanindustriallegacy
ofcoaland
steel.ThethirdsectiondiscussestheambivalenceofChristianministriestoNanTienTemple.
ThefourthidentifieshowthealderrnenofWollongongCity
Council
framedthetemplecomplex
“llhlnthcdiscoursesofmulticulturalism andorientalism. The
conclusiondiscu estheimplications
ofthesedifferentdiscursiveframings
forBuddhistsas
citizensofWollongong.
NanTienTemple,Berkeley.
Wollongong.NewSouthWalesIn
October1995.GrandMasterHsingYunpresided
overtheopeningceremony
ofNan
Tien
Temple.
In
doingso.Grand MasterHsing
Yun(whofoundedtheF0
Kuang
ShanBuddhist
Sectin 1967 in
Taiwan)
effectivelycreateda
Buddhistsacredsiteinthesuburbof
Berkeley,
Wollongong
FortheF0Kuang
Shanthe
sitelinksheavenand
earth;
thecomplexisreferredtoasa‘purelandonearth".ForLocatingaBuddhirltemple
in
Wollongong75overthreeyears,Wollongongresidentshadwatchedthepreviously
vacant,councilownedlandonthenorthsideofBerkeley’sFlagstaffHillbeing
transformedintooneoftheworld's
largestBuddhist
shrines,costinganestimatedA550million.The9.65hectaresiteincludedatemple
withitsmain
shrine.auditorium,
diningandkitchen
facilities,accommodation,classrooms.meditationrooms.museum.library,sleepingquarters
andadministrationarea.Theadjacentpagoda
hadtwoshrinesandalcovesfortheashesof73.000people.
ThisBuddhistsacredsitewashoundedby
residential
propertyalongthesouthwestborder.thepublicly
ownedWollongong
Crematorium
alongthenortheast
boundary.theF6
Freewayalongthenorthwestborder
and,tothe
south,anothervacantcouncil
block,thesummitofFlagstaff]
till.The
templc‘sgates,itsBuddhastatuesandChinesepalace
architec-turalstyle
,
dominated
bybrilliantgreen.red.
yellowandochrecolours,
visuallyintroducedanew setofsymbols
thatcontrastedstarkly
with thesurrounding
lightindustry
sheds.
powercables.F6Freewayandroofsofsuburbia.Equally
striking
wastheintroductionofanewsetofreligiouspractices
associatedwithaBuddhistsacredsiteintoasuburbpreviously
dominatedby
routines
ofwork,homeandpredominantly
Christiancremation.Thesanctifiedsitewasseparated
fromtheprofane
throughnaming.
knowing.ceremony,ritesandspatialorganization
(Jackson
and Henric1983:
94).AsCarmichael. Hubert.ReevesandSchanchc(1994)
argued,sacredsitesbecomeVestedwithcultural
identityandplace-based
attachmentsthroughbeing
vestedwithawholerangeofritesandasetofbeliefs.Inthe
19905.
Wollongong,situatedsome 80kmsouthofSydney.may
haveatfirstappeared
a remarkablelocation. Ofthe
140,000Buddhists residentinAustralia in 1991 whendecisions over the
temple'slocation werebeing
Considered.
themajoritylivedinthestateofNewSouthWales(59.000),particu-
larly
intheSydney
suburbsofFairfield
(19.904)andBankstown(13.691)(ABS1991).
Sydneywasthemoreobviouschoice.Indeed,since1988.theF0Kuang
Sharialready
hadanestablished
presenceinthecentralbusinessdistrictofSydney
(theNanTienCentre.
DarlingHarbour),Inpart.thiswastoaccommodatetheincreasing
numbersofBuddhistwhoweremigrants
fromVietnamand
later.fromBurma.China.and
HongKong.Wollongong,
unlike
Sydney.neitherprovided
theinfrastructurenor hadtheeconomytoattract
largenumbersofmorerecentAsianmigrants.
Incomparison.
according
tothe1995 Australian census.
Wollongong,had atotalpopulation
ofover210.000.which waspredominantly
Christian. withonlyaround 800Buddhists.thesebeingwidely
distributed
throughoutitssuburbanmatrix.WhiletheWollongong
CityCouncilpraised
thecity'sculturaldiversity.
thepopulation
remainedfairlyhomogeneousby
religion.Christianitypredominated
andeventhemajority
ofpeople
fromnon~Eng1ish
speaking
countrieshadaEuropean
heritage
(predominantly
fromItaly.
Macedonia,
Germany.NetherlandsandGreece).Thiscultural
heritagereflected
Wollongong'spost-WorldWarIImigration policies
andthelabourrequirements
ofWollongong'ssteel
industry. Equally.the 1995Australiancensusdatasuggested
thatthesuburbofBerkeley
wasnotonlypredomi-
nantly
Christian.butalsoaplace
ot'residcncctomainly
Anglo-CelticAustralians(85%)
andasuburbofrelativesocialdisadvantage
inWollongong
(ABS1996).