The Evolution of Operational Art. From Napoleon to the Present

(Tina Meador) #1

  1. Frank Kitson,Warfare as a Whole(London: Faber, 1987), 153–4.

  2. Christopher N. Donnelly, ‘Soviet Operational Concepts in the 1980s’, in the report of
    the European Security Study,Strengthening Conventional Deterrence in Europe: Propo-
    sals for the 1980s(London: Macmillan, 1983), 133 (italics in the original).

  3. The report of the European Security Study,Strengthening Conventional Deterrence in
    Europe, was the key public document in launching this debate; John J. Mearsheimer,
    Conventional Deterrence(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), set the intellec-
    tual contours, and Hew Strachan, ‘Conventional Defence in Europe’,International
    Affairs, LXI (1984), 27–43, summarizes its development.

  4. Bagnall’s contribution is still in need of a full study, but Colin McInnes,Hot War, Cold
    War: The British Army’s Way in Warfare, 1945–95(London: Brassey’s, 1996), 54–75,
    covers the main points, and see also John Kiszely,The British Army and Approaches to
    Warfare since 1945(Strategic and Combat Studies Institute: The Occasional, no. 26,
    1997), reprinted in Brian Holden Reid (ed.),Military Power: Land Warfare in Theory
    and Practice(London: Cass, 1997).

  5. Richard Hooker, Jr (ed.),Maneuver Warfare: An Anthology(Novato, CA: Presidio,
    1993), contains many of the most important texts for Americans, and makes clear how
    important the German, rather than the Russian, model was.

  6. Karl-Heinz Frieser,Blitzkrieg-Legende. Der Westfeldzug 1940(Munich: Oldenbourg,
    1995) is the best exposition of these points; for a classic but self-serving misinterpre-
    tation of history designed to suit the British army’s agenda, see Garry Johnson, ‘An
    Option for Change without Decay’,Journal of the Royal United Services Institute for
    Defence Studies, CXXXVI, no. 3 (Autumn 1991), 12.

  7. Ma ̈der,In Pursuit of Conceptual Excellence, 99; these papers appeared in the publica-
    tions of the Strategic and Combat Studies Institute, and also in J. J. G. Mackenzie and
    Brian Holden Reid (eds.),The British Army and the Operational Level of War(London:
    Tri-Service Press, 1989).

  8. The key text here is Shimon Naveh,In Pursuit of Military Excellence: The Evolution of
    Operational Theory(London: Frank Cass, 1997); Naveh’s book is dedicated to the
    memory of Simpkin.

  9. Richard Simpkin,Race to the Swift: Thoughts on Twenty-First Century Warfare(Lon-
    don: Brassey’s, 1985), 24.

  10. Ma ̈der,In Pursuit of Conceptual Excellence, 89.

  11. Michael Yardley and Dennis Sewell,A New Model Army(London: W. H. Allen, 1989),
    89.
    91.Design for Military Operations—The British Military Doctrine, prepared under the
    direction of the chief of the general staff (London: HMSO, 1989), 39–47.

  12. Nigel Bagnall, ‘Foreword’, in Mackenzie and Reid (eds.),British Army and the Opera-
    tional Level of War, vii.

  13. Colin McInnes, ‘The Gulf War, 1990–1’, in Hew Strachan (ed.),Big Wars and Small
    Wars: The British Army and the Lessons of War in the 20th Century(London: Routledge,
    2006), 162–79.

  14. Johnson, ‘An Option for Change without Decay’, 13.

  15. A. S. H. Irwin,The Levels of War: Operational Art and Campaign Planning(Strategic
    and Combat Studies Institute: The Occasional, no. 5, 1993), 3.

  16. J. J. A. Wallace, ‘Manoeuvre Theory in Operations Other Than War’, in Reid (ed.),
    Military Power, 207–26.

  17. Johnson, ‘An Option for Change without Decay’, 13.


Operational Art and Britain, 1909–2009 135
Free download pdf