unlikely    Aidan   will    look    into    Dad’s   eyes    and coo,    “Great  parenting   style,
Dad.”   No, he  will    probably    be  kicking and screaming   like    a   banshee.
Everybody   in  Burger  King    will    be  watching    every   move    Dad makes   as  he
hauls   this    wild,   flailing    kid out the door.   Let them    watch.  First,  the people
in  the restaurant  aren’t  saying  to  themselves, Look    what    a   bad parent  that
guy is. They’re thinking,   Thank   goodness    that’s  not my  kid.    Now I   can eat
in  peace.   Second,     parents     of  six-year-olds   don’t   go  into    a   place   like
Burger  King    to  build   lasting relationships   with    the other   people  dining
there,   so  who     cares   what    they    think?  And     third,  teaching    a   child
responsibility  is  not a   free    ride.   We  must    steel   ourselves   for resistance
and opposition. There’s a   price   we  must    pay.
Keep the Parental Trap Buttoned
To  ensure  that    Aidan   has a   learning    experience  from    this    incident,   his
mom and dad must    remember    one thing:  to  keep    their   mouths  shut.   Save
the words   for happy   times.  Again,  Love    and Logic   parents have    a   limited
vocabulary. The only    time    to  reason  with    a   child   is  when    both    parties are
happy.  Parents who enforce the consequences    for their   child   with    their
mouths   moving  strip   the     consequences    of  their   value.  Allow   the
consequences    to  do  the teaching.
Carrying    the kicking and screaming   Aidan   out the restaurant  door,   Dad
would   then    put him very    gently  in  the car and drive   off,    all the while
keeping mum about   the incident.   Before  the evening is  over,   Aidan   will
probably    say something   very    intelligent:    “I’m    hungry.”    When    he  says    it,
Dad  should  stifle  the     temptation  to  get     angry   and     say,    “Sure,  you’re
hungry. I   try to  tell    you these   things, but you never   listen. That’ll teach
you  to  eat     your    hamburger   in  the     restaurant.”    Such    a   response    only
engenders   more    antagonism  and resistance  in  the child.
Dad should  administer  the consequences    with    a   compassionate   sadness.
For example:    “Oh,    for sure,   son.    That’s  what    happens to  me  when    I   miss
my  dinner. I’ll    bet you’ll  be  anxious for breakfast.  Don’t   worry   —   we’ll
cook     a   good    one.”   Without     doubt,  Aidan   will    learn   more    from    this
response    than    from    anger   and threats.    Sorrow  and consequences    and an
arm around  his shoulder    are powerful    teaching    agents.