Microsoft Word - Revised dissertation2.docx

Q469 MT Num 20:26 +#phw OV(l) – Difference in grammati-
4QNumb XII 13 ii, cal form.^1065
15-17 i 24

ht+[

Q470 MT Num 21:12 omits SV(2) – The MT lacks the addi-
4QNumb XIII 17 ii- tional text in 4QNumb.^1066
18 13-15

]m Nt) )wl [ ... ]m)wy[

Q471 MT Num 21:13 omits SV(2) – The MT lacks the addi-
4QNumb XIII 17 ii- tional text in 4QNumb.^1067
18 16-17

]l yk [ ... ]m[ ]lwbg

Q472 MT Num 21:21 omits SV(2) – The MT lacks the addi-
4QNumb XIII 17 i- tional text in 4QNumb.^1068
18 27

hmhl[ ]xys[ ... ]rm)wyw

Q473 MT Num 22:5 )whw OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QNumb XIV 19 27 h)[ pronunciation.

Q474 MT Num 22:6 )wh OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QNumb XIV 19 29 h)[ pronunciation.

Q475 MT Num 21:7 omits SV(1) – The MT lacks the object
4QNumb XV 20-22 marker.
1

t)

Q476 MT Num 22:9 omits SV(2) – 4QNumb has an explicat-

1065
1066 The Hiph‘il imperative in the MT is written as jussive in 4QNumb, in agreement with the SP.
The SP agrees with 4QNumb in the interpolation from Deut 2:9. See E. Ulrich and F.M. Cross, Qumran
Cave 4. VII, 229, for a restoration of the text based on the SP, and for the variants from the SP contained
therein. The additional material is not found in the MT or the LXX. 1067
The SP agrees with 4QNumb in the interpolation from Deut 2:17-19. See E. Ulrich and F.M. Cross,
Qumran Cave 4. VII, 229, for a restoration of the text based on the SP, and for the variants from the SP
contained therein. The additional material is not found in the MT or the LXX. 1068
The SP agrees with 4QNumb in the interpolation from Deut 2:24-25. See E. Ulrich and F.M. Cross,
Qumran Cave 4. VII, 229, for a restoration of the text based on the SP, and for the variants from the SP
contained therein. The additional material is not found in the MT or the LXX.