- -. -- ... - -.. - - _.. -- -
- .-
Rate of Return Analysis 213
If an electromagnet is installed on the input conveyor of a coal-processing plant, it will pick up
scrap metal in the coal. The removal of this metal will save an estimated $1200 per year in costs
associated with machinery damage due to metal. The electromagnetic equipment has an estimated
useful life of 5 years and no salvage value. Two suppliers have been contacted: Leaseco will provide
the equipment in return for three beginning-of-year annual payments of $1000 each; Saleco will
provide the equipment for $2783. If the MARR is 10%, which supplier should be selected?
SOLUTION
Sinceboth suppliers will provide equipment with the same useful life and benefits, thisis afixed-
output situation. In rate of return analysis, the method of solution is to examine the differences
between the alternatives. By taking Saleco - Leaseco,we obtain an increment of inves-tment..
Compute the NPW at various interest rates on the increment of investment represented by the
difference between the alternatives.
*Each year the cash flow is multiplied by(P/F, i, n).
AtO%:(P/F,0%,n)= 1 for all values ofn
At 00%:(P/F,00%,0) = 1
(Pj F,00%,n) = 0 for all other values ofn
"
----
.- - "
--- - - - - ---'- ---- - - -----
Difference Between Alternatives:
Year Leaseco Saleco Saleco-Leaseco
(^0) -$1000 -$2783 -$1783
1
{ -1000
- 1200 + 1200 +1000
2
{ -1000 - 1200 + 1000.
- 1200
(^3) + 1200 + 1200 0
(^4) +1200 + 1200 0
(^5) + 1200 +1200 0
,. ..' .,., -' .........,.g
pw*
Year Cash Flow:
n Saleco-Leaseco At 0%. At 8% At 20% At 00%
(^0) -$1783 -$1783 -$173 -$1783 -$1783
(^1) + 1000 + 1000 +926 +833 0
(^2) + 1000 + 1000 +857 +694 0
3 0 0 0 0 0
(^400000)
(^500000)
NPW= +217 0 -256 -1783