Homology and Homoplasy 451[Owen, 1949]R. Owen. textitOn the Nature of limbs. A Discourse delivered on Friday February
9, at an evening meeting of the Royal Institution of Great Britain. John Van Voorst, London,
1949.
[Padian, 1997]K. Padian. The rehabilitation of Sir Richard Owen.BioScience, 47: 446–453,
1997.
[Panchen, 1992] A. L. Panchen.Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
[Panchen, 1999] A. L. Panchen. Homology — history of a concept. In G. R. Bock and G. Cardew
(eds.),Homology. Novartis Foundation Symposium 222, pages 141–157. Wiley, Chichester,
1999.
[Parra-Olea and Wake, 2001]G. Parra-Olea and D. B. Wake. Extreme morphological ecological
homoplasy in tropical salamanders.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98: 7888–7891, 2001.
[Patterson, 1982]C. Patterson. Morphological characters and homology. In K. A. Joysey and
A. E. Friday (eds.),Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, pages 21–74. Academic Press,
London, 1982.
[Patterson, 1988]C. Patterson. Homology in classical and molecular biology.Molec. Biol. Evol.,
5: 603–625, 1988.
[Raff, 1996] R. A. Raff.The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal
Form. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996.
[Raikow, 1975] R. J. Raikow. The evolutionary reappearance of ancestral muscles as develop-
mental anomalies in two species of birds.Condor, 77: 514–517, 1975.
[Rathke, 1839]H. Rathke.Bemerkungen ̈uber die Entwickelung des Sch ̈adels der Wirbelthiere,
K ̈onigsberg, 1839.
[Reilly and Lauder, 1988]S. M. Reilly and G. V. Lauder. Atavisms and the homology of hy-
obranchial elements in lower vertebrates.J. Morphol, 195: 237–246, 1988.
[Richards, 1987a]E. Richards. A question of property rights: Richard Owen’s evolutionism
reassessed.Brit. J. Hist. Sci., 20: 129–171, 1987.
[Richards, 1987b] R. J. Richards.Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind
and Behavior. Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1987.
[Richmond, 2000]M. L. Richmond. T. H. Huxley’s criticism of German cell theory: An epige-
netic and physiological interpretation of cell structure.J. Hist. Biol., 33: 247–289, 2000.
[Riedl, 1978] R. Riedl.Order in LIving Organisms. A Systems Analysis of Evolution. Translated
by R. P. S. Jefferies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1978.
[Rieppel, 1988] O. Rieppel.Fundamentals of Comparative Biology.Birkh ̈auser Verlag, Basel,
1988.
[Rieppel and Kearney, 2002]O. Rieppel and M. Kearney. Similarity.Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 175:
59–82, 2002.
[Robertet al., 2001]J. S. Robert, B. K. Hall, and W. M. Olson. Bridging the gap between
developmental systems theory and evolutionary developmental biology.BioEssays, 23: 954–
962, 2001.
[Rupke, 1993]N. Rupke. Richard Owen’s vertebrate archetype.Isis, 84: 231–251, 1993.
[Rupke, 1994]N. A. Rupke.Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist. Yale University Press, New
Haven, CT., 1994.
[Russell, 1916] E. S. Russell.Form and Function. A Contribution to the History of Animal
Morphology, John Murray, London, 1916. (Reprinted 1972 by Gregg International Publishers
Ltd, Westmead, England, and in 1982 by The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, with a
new introduction by George V. Lauder.)
[Sanderson and Hufford, 1996] M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford (eds.).Homoplasy: Recurrence
of Similarity in Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, 1996.
[Sattler, 1984]R. Sattler. Homology – a continuing challenge.Syst. Bot., 9: 382–394, 1984.
[Sattler, 1992]R. Sattler. Process morphology: structural dynamics in development and evolu-
tion.Can. J. Bot., 70: 708–714, 1992.
[Sattler, 1994]R. Sattler. Homology, Homeosis, and process morphology in plants. In B. K. Hall
(ed.),Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology, pages 424–475. Academic
Press, San Diego, 1994.
[Sattler and Jeune, 1992]R. Sattler and B. Jeune. Multivariate analysis confirms the continuum
view of plant form.Ann. Bot., 69: 249–262, 1992.
[Serres, 1824] E. R. A. Serres. Explication du syst`eme nerveus des animaux invert ́ebr ́es.Ann.
Sci.Nat. 3 , 377-380, 1824.