4.3 Skew-Symmetric Determinants 71
b.
2 n
∑
k=i
Ejk=(−1)
j+1
δi,odd,i≤j
=(−1)
j+1
δi,even, i>j
c.
i− 1
∑
k=1
Ejk=(−1)
j+1
δi,even,i≤j
=(−1)
j+1
δi,odd, i>j.
Proof. Referring to Lemma 4.14(b,c),
2 n
∑
k=1
Ejk=
j− 1
∑
k=1
Ejk+Ejj+
2 n
∑
k=j+1
Ejk
=−
j− 1
∑
k=1
(−1)
j+k+1
+0+
2 n
∑
k=j+1
(−1)
j+k+1
=(−1)
j+1
(δj,even+δj,odd)
=(−1)
j+1
,
which proves (a).
Ifi≤j,
2 n
∑
k=i
Ejk=
[
2 n
∑
k=1
−
i− 1
∑
k=1
]
Ejk
=(−1)
j+1
+
i− 1
∑
k=1
(−1)
j+k+1
=(−1)
j+1
(1−δj,even)
=(−1)
j+1
δi,odd.
Ifi>j,
2 n
∑
k=i
Ejk=
2 n
∑
k=i
(−1)
j+k+1
=(−1)
j+1
δi,even,
which proves (b).
i− 1
∑
k=1
Ejk=
[
2 n
∑
k=1
−
2 n
∑
k=i
]
Ejk.
Part (c) now follows from (a) and (b).
LetEnbe a skew-symmetric determinant defined as follows:
En=|εij|n,
whereεij=1,i<j, andεji=−εij, which impliesεii=0.