Assessing Leadership Style: Trait Analysis

(Ron) #1
The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders

her of reasons why the Gulf Crisis was particularly suitable for such
analysis:



  1. The episode covered a long time period (from the Kuwait
    invasion [August 2] to the cease-fire [February 27], nearly
    eight months), giving the protagonists many opportunities
    to present and discuss their perceptions, motives, goals,
    interpretations, plans, reactions to other participants and
    to events, and so forth.

  2. A wide range of diplomatic, economic, and military
    maneuvers emerged at various stages of the confrontation,
    with different individuals and nations taking active and
    reactive roles at different times.

  3. Many nations and leaders, representing very different cul-
    tures, were involved, and the degree of involvement (for
    example, potential losses and gains) also varied.

  4. Both cooperative and competitive strategies were tried,
    including armed attacks both with and without warning.

  5. In a high proportion of the countries most closely
    involved, the leader speaks for the government; his state-
    ments represent his views on the topic, not merely the
    transmission of a group decision.
    The University of British Columbia research group conducted
    two studies dealing with the integrative complexity of leaders dur-
    ing this set of events. One (Wallace, Suedfeld, and Thachuk 1993a,
    1993b) included statements made by heads of state and relevant
    high officials of many of the nations that played a part in the Gulf
    Crisis in the forums of the UN and international diplomacy; the
    other (Suedfeld, Wallace, and Thachuk 1993) concentrated on the
    top leaders of Middle Eastern countries.
    The following comparisons of integrative complexity levels were
    made in the two articles: leaders of more involved nations with lead-
    ers of less involved ones; heads of state versus other officials; and pro-
    and anti-Iraq leaders. We also conducted detailed comparisons of
    George H. W. Bush and Hussein and examined changes in the com-
    plexity of particular individuals as the crisis progressed toward a
    solution. Several interesting findings emerged; in relation to Hus-
    sein, the following were perhaps the most informative (the complex-

Free download pdf