Wrestling with Nature From Omens to Science

Science and Technology 249

neering Chemistry 8 (1916): 561; and Whitney, “Research as a National Duty,” Science 43
(1916): 636.

20. Frank B. Jewett, “Industrial Research with Some Notes Concerning Its Scope in
    the Bell Telephone System,” Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers
    36 (1917): 845.


21. John J. Carty, “The Relation of Pure Science to Industrial Research,” Science 44
    (1916): 515.


22. Ronald Kline and Thomas Lassman, “Competing Research Traditions in Ameri-
    can Industry: Uncertain Alliances between Engineering and Science at Westinghouse
    Electric, 1886–1935,” Enterprise and Society 6 (2005): 601–45.


23. Charles P. Steinmetz, “Scientifi c Research in Its Relation to the Industries,”
    Journal of the Franklin Institute 182 (1916): 711, 716, 717.


24. Vladimir Karapetoff, “Discussion,” Transactions of the American Institute of Elec-
    trical Engineers 36 (1917): 890.


25. Robert A. Millikan, “Research in America after the War,” Transactions of the
    American Institute of Electrical Engineers 37 (1918): 1725; and E. P. Hyde, “Discussion,”
    Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 37 (1918): 739.


26. George E. Hale, “The Responsibilities of the Scientist,” Science 50 (1919): 144;
    and Hale, “The National Importance of Scientifi c and Industrial Research,” Bulletin of
    the National Research Council 1 (1919): 6.


27. Robert A. Millikan, “The Relation of Science to Industry,” Science 69 (1929): 28
    (original emphasis).


28. Gano Dunn, “The Relationship between Science and Engineering,” Science 71
    (1930): 277.


29. Frank B. Jewett, “Problems of the Engineer,” Science 75 (1932): 256.


30. Frank B. Jewett, “Communication Engineering,” Science 85 (1937): 591.


31. Irving Langmuir, “Atomic Hydrogen as an Aid to Industrial Research,” The
    Collected Works of Irving Langmuir, 12 vols. (New York: Pergamon Press, 1960–1962),
    12:251–263; and Langmuir, “Chemical Research,” in The Collected Works of Irving Lang-
    muir, 12:309–34.


32. Robert Ridgway, “The Modern City and the Engineer’s Relation to It,” Transac-
    tions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 88 (1925): 1247.


33. Charles R. Richards, “The Functions of Section M—Engineering,” Science 67
    (1928): 6.


34. Harrison P. Eddy, “Trends in Engineering as a Profession in the United States of
    America,” Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 99 (1934): 1383.


35. Karl T. Compton, “Investment for Public Welfare,” Science 83 (1936): 509;
    Compton, “Engineering in an American Program for Social Progress,” Science 85 (1937):
    277; and Compton, “Elihu Thomson the Scientist,” Science 89 (1939): 188.


36. Chester L. Dawes, “Some Aspects of the Electrical Engineering Teaching Prob-
    lem,” Journal of Engineering Education 19 (1929): 640.


37. Vannevar Bush, “Electrical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Tech-
    nology,” June 3, 1935, MIT Archives, collection MC 5, Box 3, Folder 244.


38. C. Edward Magnusson, “Engineering Research—An Essential Factor in Engi-
    neering Education,” Journal of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 44 (1925):
    1243–45, 1244.