D: The motivations which have built the image consist in our being bound to a
certain mode of operation. So long as the mind refuses to let go, we are
preventing communication.
P: I think that approach is totally wrong. If you are going to be caught in trying
to be free of the image, you will never be free of it.
K: You are right.
P: You said that image and conclusion end communication, but you have to be
confronted with this.
K: What is going on all the time, consciously or unconsciously, is that I am
committed, or I shall be committed, or I am being committed; therefore
communication is only up to a point and not beyond. This is what is happening
all the time.
P: The image is built up of a lot of little things; it is what it is. I have tried to
tackle it for twenty-two years, and now I say: Let me leave it alone; let me move,
let me see whether what is static can be freed. Then it will do what it will.
A: But these million years of the past, how am I going to tackle that?
F: Can two brains with different pasts, different histories, different experience,
feel the same thing at the same level? How is it possible?
K: The way you put the question is wrong.
P: I cannot break the image which has taken a million years to build. Can I break
this instrument and make it flexible, moving? That is all.
A: There is one point which needs to be taken into account. There are certain
accretions, and they can be dropped as they are pointed out in communication.
This kind of thing happens effortlessly.
P: All of us who have participated these thirty days know, understand up to the
point when thought ends. I am certain that what has to happen has to happen
there.
K: Let us put the same thing in a different way. Is there a possibility of
communicating or of experiencing that which is not verbal? The whole
implication of experiencing is wrong.
P: Let me understand that. It is a very important statement: The whole of
experiencing is wrong.