William_T._Bianco,_David_T._Canon]_American_Polit

(nextflipdebug2) #1
A32 Endnotes

9 3. “Fair Housing: It’s Your Right.” U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development, http://www.hud.gov/program_offices/
fair_housing _equal_opp/online-complaint (accessed 4/18/18).


  1. United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000).

  2. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531
    U.S. 356 (2001). However, in State of Tennessee v. George Lane
    and Beverly Jones, 541 U.S. 509 (2004), the Court ruled that the
    disabled must have access to courthouses.
    9 6. The White House, “Remarks by the Reception Commemorating
    the Enactment of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr.
    Hate Crimes Prevention Act,” October 28, 2009, https://
    obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-
    president-reception-commemorating-enactment-matthew-
    shepard-and-james-byrd- (accessed 4/18/18).
    9 7. Tim Mak, “Post–‘Don’t Ask,’ Gay Navy Lt. Marries,”
    Politico, September 20, 2011, http://www.politico.com/news/
    stories/0911/63909.html (accessed 1/2 4/1 2).
    9 8. Justin Jouvenal, “Federal Judge in D.C. Blocks Part of Trump’s
    Transgender Military Ban,” Washington Post, October 30,
    2017, http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/
    federal-judge-in-dc-blocks-part-of-trumps-transgender-
    military-ban/2017/10/30/41d41526-bd94-11e7-959c-
    fe2b598d8c00_story.html?utm_term=.fe88c4776b62
    (accessed 11/6/17).
    9 9. On July 18, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
    upheld a block on the implementation of the ban. See Ellen
    Mitchell, “Court Rules Against Trump Administration on
    Transgender Military Ban,” The Hill, July 18, 2018, http://www.thehill
    .com/policy/defense/397702-court-rules-against-trump-
    admin-on-transgender-military-ban (accessed 7/24/18).

  3. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Lyndon B.
    Johnson, 1965, vol. 2, entry 301 (Washington, DC: Government
    Printing Office, 1966), pp. 635–40.
    1 01. The first poll is from the Pew Research Center, October 4, 2017,
    http://www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/4-race-immigration-
    and-discrimination/4 _ 7-6/ and the second from Gallup, July
    8, 2016, news.gallup.com/poll/193508/oppose-colleges-
    considering-race-admissions.aspx (both accessed 4/18/18).
    1 02. State of California, article 1, section 31.
    1 03. The training program case was United Steel Workers of America
    v. Webe r, 443 U.S. 193 (1979); the labor union case was Sheet
    Metal Workers v. EEOC, 478 U.S. 421 (1986); and the Alabama
    state police case was U.S. v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149 (1987).

  4. Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. (2009).

  5. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).

  6. Smith v. University of Washington, 233 F3d 1188 (9th Cir. 2000).

  7. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was the law school
    case and Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was the
    undergraduate admissions case.

  8. In Bakke, Justice Lewis Powell was the only member of the
    Court who held this position, even if it became the basis for
    all affirmative action programs over the next 25 years. Four
    justices in the Bakke decision wanted to get rid of race as a
    factor in admissions, and another four thought that the “strict
    scrutiny” standard should not even be applied in this instance.

  9. Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 572 U.S.
    (2014).

  10. Fisher v. University of Texas, Austin, 579 U.S. (2016).
    1 11. Adam Harris, “In Trump Era, the Use of Race in Admissions
    Comes under New Scrutiny,” Chronicle of Higher Education,
    August 2, 2017, http://www.chronicle.com/article/In-Trump-Era-
    the-Use-of-Race/240821?cid=rclink (accessed 11/6/17).

  11. Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U.S. (2018).


1 13. James Vicini, “Supreme Court to Decide Arizona
Immigration Law,” Reuters, December 12, 2011, http://www.reuters.
com/article/2011/12/12/us-usa-immigration-arizona-
idUSTRE7BB0XJ20111212 (accessed 2/2/12).


  1. Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. (2012).
    1 15. Fernanda Santos, “Arizona Immigration Law Survives
    Ruling,” New York Times, September 6, 2012, http://www.nytimes.
    com/2012/09/07/us/key-element-of-arizona-immigration-
    law-survives-ruling.html?r=0 (accessed 10/5/12).
    1 16. Immigration, various polls, http://www.pollingreport.com/
    immigration.htm (accessed 1/30/16).
    1 17. Kirk Semple and Miriam Jordan, “For Families Split at Border,
    an Anguished Wait for Children’s Return,” New York Times,
    September 1, 2018, http://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/world/
    americas/immigrant-families-separation-border.html
    (accessed 9/26/18).
    1 18. “An Act Providing for the Collection of Data Relative to Traffic
    Stops,” Massachusetts state law, Chapter 228 of the Acts of
    2000, http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw00/sl000228.htm
    (accessed 7/22/08).


Take a Stand
a. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 579 U.S. (2016).
b. Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 572
U.S. (2014).

Chapter 6
1. V. O. Key, The Responsible Electorate. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1966).
2. Adam Berinsky, “Telling the Truth about Believing the Lies?
Evidence for the Limited Prevalence of Expressive Survey
Responding,” Journal of Politics 80:1 (2018): 211–24.
3. For a review, see Arthur Lupia and Mathew D. McCubbins, The
Democratic Dilemma (New York: Cambridge University Press,
1998).
4. Larry Bartels, “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996,”
American Journal of Political Science 44 (2000): 35–50.
5. Robert S. Erikson, Michael B. Mackuen, and James A. Stimson,
The Macro Polity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
6. John Zaller, “Coming to Grips with V. O. Key’s Concept of
Latent Opinion” (unpublished paper, University of California,
Los Angeles, 1998).
7. Morris Fiorina, Retrospective Voting in American National
Elections (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).
8. Virginia Sapiro, “Not Your Parents’ Political Socialization:
Introduction for a New Generation,” Annual Review of Political
Science 7 (2004): 1–23.
9. M. Kent Jennings and Richard G. Niemi, Generations and
Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).
1 0. Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of
American Community (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).
1 1. Richard G. Niemi and Mary Hepburn, “The Rebirth of Political
S o cia l i zat ion,” Perspectives on Politics 24 (1995): 7–16.
1 2. David Campbell, Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape
Our Civic Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).
1 3. Sidney Verba, Kay Schlozman, and Henry Brady, Voice and
Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics (Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
1 4. Paul Allen Beck and M. Kent Jennings, “Pathways to
Participation,” American Political Science Review 76 (1982): 94–108.

Full_20_APT_64431_END_A23-A54.indd 32 15/11/18 2:38 PM

Free download pdf