Across Forest, Steppe, and Mountain_ Environment, Identity, and Empire in Qing China\'s Borderlands

(Ann) #1
So from the eighteenth century and far from the coast the radiation

of a dominant arablist order beyond the confines of Hanspace became

quite visible through the critical or enthusiastic eyes of Nayančeng,

Giohoto, Zhang Zhidong, Ortai, Shurungga, Gao Qizhuo, Jungfoboo,

Chang Deshou, Sun Jiagan, and Prince Güngsangnorbu or in the

bewildered expressions on paper and stone of Warka and Yi. The

dynasty’s reactions to this trend are well represented by the diversity

of opinion of these men who had all devoted their energies to assisting

the Qing in its sustained attempt to rule across a wide range of peoples

and ecologies. To this end, the state assembled a commensurate array

of resources that, contrary to the intentions of the Qing elite that

includes many of the names listed above, turned out to promote the

reproductive and political interests of the empire’s Han subjects. In

terms consistent with those formulated in previous chapters, Qingfields

grew decisively in imperial arablist terms at the expense of the other

imperial environmental relations of venery, Zomi-culture, herding, and

foraging.

Of course, swiddeners, foragers, and herders did not otherwise live in

perfect harmony. Mongol pastoral practices in 1729 , for example, so

affected some Urianghaiotogforaging in Uliastai that they had to be

relocated far southward to undisrupted hunting grounds in Qiqihar.

Conflict could also arise among groups engaged in the same activities.

This set Hejen and Fiyaka against Solon-Ewenki and Dagur poachers

who were chasing sable across the territorial boundaries of Jilin and

Heilongjiang in 1731. Hunting Solon-Ewenki from Heilongjiang continued

to poach sable in Jilin territory well into the Qianlong reign in violation of

state regulations that seem partly intended to separate foraging areas in

forests similar to the way pastures were separated in the steppe.^6 Such

violations, possibly motivated by local resource exhaustion, could even be

committed to fulfill pelt tribute obligations. As in the 1754 incident of

Heilongjiang Hunting Solon-Ewenki’stheftof 253 Jilin sable pelts, imperial

foraging began to pay its tribute by plundering itself, a dramatic omen of a

sustainability crisis.

Problems generated between or within Zomi-culture, herding,

and foraging were nevertheless muchsmaller in scale and sprawl than

those germinated by the more imposing success of arablism. This very

success, however, was achieved in partially inadvertent terms that,

as such, were insufficiently cognizant of the full range of contributing

interdependencies. Domestic and foreign threats across all borderlands

were critical factors for the agro-urban concentration of resources

268 Across Forest, Steppe, and Mountain
Free download pdf