AnExplanation
ofMilitary
Slavery
87the
filthoflustful
pleasures,unmarred
bythe
habitsof
civilisation,withtheir
youthful
strengthunshattered
byexcessesof
luxury.7The
advantagesofenslavementwill
beillustrated
by
comparingslaves withthe
twoalternate
typesof
marginal-areasoldiersfightingfor
governments:mercenariesand
allies.AcquisitionAgovernmentcould
procureslaves
more
easilythanit
couldeither
mercenariesor
allies.It
mightpurchase,
capture,abduct,or
steala
slave,but
obviouslynota
freeman.A
slavecouldbecompelledto
jointhe
army;mercenaries
hadtobeenticed
toserve,and
allieshadtofinditexpedient.The
slavewas
subjecttomoreactiveand
flexiblemeans
of
persuasion.By
recruitinghimthrough enslavement, the ruler
did not have to
wait untilcooperativemarginalareasoldiers
appeared
onthe
scene,7acommonpredicamentofgovernmentsthat
didnotenslavesol-diers
(suchas
Byzantiumand
China).Incontrast
tothelimitedconditions
underwhich
mercenariesorallies
agreed to
fight,slavescame
accordingtocircumstance:
somearrivedas
tribute;othersas
merchandise,
booty,contraband,orstolenproperty.Militaryslaveswere
usuallyprocuredaschildrenand
this,too,facilitatedtheiracquisition.While
mercenariesandallies
couldonlybefound
among
friendlypeoples, childrencouldbeab-ducted or
capturedfrom
enemies inwartime
and,
throughtrainingmadeintofaithful
soldiers.The
poolof
potentialslavescouldbe
manytimes
largerthan
thatoffreerecruits.Enslavementgaveaccesstoawidevarietyofnationalitiesandthis
provided
thearmy
withabeneficialdiversityof
troops,asthey often
brought withthemthe
specialskills oftheir own
peoples:
73This
multiplicityof
ethnic
backgroundsand
skillscontributed
directly
tothe
flexibilityandtactical
powerof
Is-lamicate
armies.Though
mercenariesandallies,too,could
have
71.Clbar5:371
(adoptedfromAyaion,"Yhsa"
C1;119;see
Appendix2).72.Hrbek,
p.545.73.
Bosworth,
Ghaznavids,p.108.