TheFirst
MilitarySlaveSystem 143
WhenMarwnb.
Muh.
ammad(laterMarwanII)invadedAr-
meniainthe
early120/740s,he
signedmany
treatieswith
sepa-
ratelocalrulers;in
Fut.h
al-Bulclfin,al-Baldhfrimentionsnine
in
all.
In
threeofthemthe
conqueredpeopleagreedto
supply
slavesandwheat
everyyear; intwo
theyagreed
todeliver
a
numberofslaves
just
onceand
henceforthto
pay
wheat
yearly;
and
intheotherfour
they
hadnoslavestodeliver.
21
Thissmall
selection
seems
typical
ofthe treaties which Muslims
signed
everywhere;
most
ofthementailedthe
delivery
ofsomeslaves.
Ononeoccasion,whenhereceived
a
single
black
ghulm,
Mar-
wan
IIis
supposed
tohavesentbackascornful
reply:"If
you
hadfound
acolorworsethanblackandanumberlessthan
one,
you
wouldhave
sentthat!
’’22
The
baqt,
a
treaty
betweentheMuslimsandtheNubiansmade
in31/652,wasthemostconfused
andthemostremarked
upon
agreement
forthe
delivery
ofslavestothe
Muslims.
23
Itre-
mainedineffectfor
oversixcenturies,until674/1276;
24
during
this
longperiod
itstermswere
changed,butthesealterations
were never
clearlydistinguished,
sothe
historianhas
many
strata to
separate.
Y.
F..Hasan’s
analysis
concludes
thatthe
originalagreementstipulatedannualNubian
delivery
ofslaves
in
exchange
for
provisions.
6
Of
allthe
reported
deliveriesofslaves,
onlyoneexplicitlyin-
dicatesthattheslaveshada
militarypurpose;
ineither125/743
or
128/746,theUmayyad
governor
of
Iraqrequested
fromthe
governor
of
Khurasan,
Nas.r
b.
Sayyfir,
1,000armedandmounted
21.FB,
pp.
208-09.
22.
Jah,p.
81;UA,
p.
235.
23.
On
the
baqt,
besidesthereferencesinY.F.
H.
asan,
TheArabsand
theSudan
(Khartoum,1973),pp.219-21,seealsoKhalifa,
p.
138;Ibn
al-Faqih,p.76;Ibn
Khurdadhbih,p.83;Michael,3:90-94,360;andHill,
Termination,pp.
43-44.
- F.Loekkegaard,"Ba.kt,"inEl
gives
thisenddate.Proofthat
this,
unlike
mostotheraccords,remainedin
effectafterthefallofthe
Umayyads
comes
from
thefactthatboththe
caliphs
al-Mahdiandal-MuCtasim
adjusteditsterms
.Hasan,TheArabs,
pp.
25-26).
25..Hasan,TheArabs,
pp.
24-25.
26.
Ibid.,pp.20,25.