Real Analysis 471
>(n+ 1 )xn+ 1 + 2
∑n
k= 1
kxk−
∑n
k= 1
kxk=
n∑+ 1
k= 1
kxk,
as desired. Furthermore,x 1 >0 by definition andx 2 ,x 3 ,...,xnare also positive by the
induction hypothesis. Therefore,xn+ 2 >(n+ 1 )xn+ 1 >(n+ 1 )(a·n!)=a·(n+ 1 )!.
This completes the induction, proving the claim.
(Romanian Team Selection Test for the International Mathematical Olympiad, 1999)
320.Denoteλ=infn≥ 1 xnnand for simplicity assume thatλ>−∞. Fix>0. Then
there existsn 0 such thatxnn 00 ≤λ+. LetM=max 1 ≤i≤n 0 xi.
An integermcan be written asn 0 q+n 1 , with 0≤n 1 <qandq=nm 0 . From the
hypothesis it follows thatxm≤qxn 0 +xn 1 ; hence
λ≤
xm
m
≤
qxn 0
m
+
xn 1
m
≤
qn 0
m
(λ+)+
M
m
.
Therefore,
λ≤
xm
m
≤
⌊
m
n 0
⌋
m
n 0
(λ+)+
M
m
.
Since
mlim→∞
nm 0
m
n 0
=1 and mlim→∞
M
m
= 0 ,
it follows that for largem,
λ≤
xm
m
≤λ+ 2 .
Sincewas arbitrary, this implies
lim
n→∞
xn
n
=λ=inf
n≥ 1
xn
n
,
as desired.
321.We use the fact that
lim
x→ 0 +
xx= 1.
As a consequence, we have
lim
x→ 0 +
xx+^1
x