Real Analysis 471>(n+ 1 )xn+ 1 + 2∑nk= 1kxk−∑nk= 1kxk=n∑+ 1k= 1kxk,as desired. Furthermore,x 1 >0 by definition andx 2 ,x 3 ,...,xnare also positive by the
induction hypothesis. Therefore,xn+ 2 >(n+ 1 )xn+ 1 >(n+ 1 )(a·n!)=a·(n+ 1 )!.
This completes the induction, proving the claim.
(Romanian Team Selection Test for the International Mathematical Olympiad, 1999)
320.Denoteλ=infn≥ 1 xnnand for simplicity assume thatλ>−∞. Fix>0. Then
there existsn 0 such thatxnn 00 ≤λ+. LetM=max 1 ≤i≤n 0 xi.
An integermcan be written asn 0 q+n 1 , with 0≤n 1 <qandq=nm 0 . From the
hypothesis it follows thatxm≤qxn 0 +xn 1 ; henceλ≤
xm
m≤
qxn 0
m+
xn 1
m≤
qn 0
m(λ+)+M
m.
Therefore,λ≤xm
m≤
⌊
m
n 0⌋
m
n 0(λ+)+M
m.
Sincemlim→∞nm 0
m
n 0=1 and mlim→∞M
m= 0 ,
it follows that for largem,λ≤
xm
m≤λ+ 2 .Sincewas arbitrary, this implieslim
n→∞xn
n=λ=inf
n≥ 1xn
n,
as desired.
321.We use the fact thatlim
x→ 0 +xx= 1.As a consequence, we have
lim
x→ 0 +xx+^1
x