12.6 The particle in a one-dimensional box 353
we have
(12.47)
with general solution, in trigonometric form,
ψ(x) 1 = 1 d
11 cos 1 ωx 1 + 1 d
21 sin 1 ωx (12.48)
We now apply the boundary conditions (12.45). Atx 1 = 10 ,
ψ(0) 1 = 1 d
11 cos 101 + 1 d
21 sin 101 = 1 d
11 = 10
and atx 1 = 1 l(having setd
11 = 10 in (12.48)),
ψ(l) 1 = 1 d
21 sin 1 ωl 1 = 10 (12.49)
It follows, because the sine function is zero only when its argument is a multiple of π,
thatωl 1 = 1 nπwhere nis an integer:
(12.50)
The solutions of the boundary value problem are therefore
(12.51)
where the permitted solutions have been labelled with the quantum numbern. The
valuen 1 = 10 has been discounted because the trivial solutionψ
0(x) 1 = 10 is not a physical
solution, and negative values of nhave been discounted because ψ
−n(x) 1 = 1 −ψ
n(x)is
merelyψ
nwith a change of sign.
For each unique solutionψ
nthere exists an energy
(12.52)
(using E 1 =1A
2ω
222 m 1 = 1 h
2ω
228 π
2m). We see that quantization of the energy is a
consequence of constraining the motion of the particle to a finite region of space by the
application of the boundary conditions; this is a general result in quantum mechanics.
We note that these results are not restricted to motion in a straight line; they are valid
for any continuous curve of length lif the variable xis measured along the curve.
The wave functions (12.51) are not yet fully specified because the coefficient d
2is
not defined. To determine d
2we invoke the quantum-mechanical interpretation of
the square of the wave function as a probability density (see also Example 10.4):
ψ
2(x)dx 1 = 1 probability that the particle be in element dxat position x
E
nh
ml
n=
2228
ψ
nxd
nx
l
() sin=,=,,,n
2123
π
...
ω=, =,±,±,
n
l
n
π
012 ...
d
dx
2220
ψ
+=ωψ