The Economist November 20th 2021 61
China
Floodproofingcities
Soaking it up
L
ocals havea saying: “When the Budd
ha’s feet are washed, Leshan cannot
sleep.” The city in the southwestern prov
ince of Sichuan has reason to be fearful.
Leshan lies at the confluence of three trib
utaries of the Yangzi river. Centuries ago its
residents carved a stone statue of the
Buddha into a cliff face. It towers 70 metres
high, overlooking the swift currents. In
August 2020 its giant toes were bathed in
river water for the first time since the Com
munist Party seized power in 1949. Thou
sands of residents suffered in the flood.
But it is not only the ancient threat of
rivers in spate that unnerves Leshan. It is
also the way the city itself has grown. By
the time of last year’s disaster, its builtup
area, including satellite towns, was more
than half as big again as it was in 2000. City
planners had failed to make due provision
for floodwater runoff.
After four decades of frantic expansion,
many other cities are in similar difficulty.
They are poorly prepared for extreme
downpours, which are likely to become
more common as a result of global warm
ing. One such storm in July over Zheng
zhou, the capital of the central province of
Henan, drenched the city in a year’s worth
of rain in three days (see picture). Cars
were swept away or trapped in flooded tun
nels, where six motorists died. Another 14
people drowned in the subway system. In
all, nearly 300 were killed. According to
Chinese researchers, average annual losses
from floods in China doubled from around
100bn yuan ($15.6bn) in the decade after
2000 to over 200bn yuan in the early 2010s.
About one in ten Chinese people lived
in cities in 1950. Now six in ten do. About
70% of those cities are in floodplains. “We
overbuilt, and we built it wrong,” says Yu
Kongjian, a landscape architect at Peking
University. Mr Yu was among the first to
urge that urban areas become “sponge cit
ies”, meaning they must be capable of ab
sorbing rain without creating floods. He
drew inspiration from old Chinese irriga
tion systems, such as “mulberry fish
ponds” that act as natural reservoirs. He es
timates that urbanisation has resulted in a
third of farmers’ ponds and half of all wet
lands disappearing.
The government has embraced the idea,
and has adopted the term sponge city. In
2015 it released a series of guidelines for
building them. The aim is for 80% of cities
to collect and recycle 70% of rainwater by
2030. Local authorities have set their own
targets. In 2018 Zhengzhou announced a
plan to ensure that nearly ninetenths of
its core urban area would be “spongified”
by 2030. This year Leshan said 40% of its
urban area would meet the government’s
spongecity standards by 2025.
Cities have long tried to prevent flood
ing with hard engineering involving the
“grey infrastructure” of dams, dykes and
barriers. But urban surfaces of tarmac and
concrete cause floodwater to rush into of
ten inadequate drains. Producing a sponge
effect requires measures such as creating
artificial wetlands, planting roadside
shrubs and using permeable materials to
build pavements and plazas.
The flooding in Zhengzhou shocked the
country. It left many Chinese wondering
whether sponge cities were all they were
cracked up to be. After all, a lot of money
has been flowing into spongification. Ex
perts reckon that implementing the gov
ernment’s spongecity guidelines will cost
L ESHAN
Extreme rainfall is taking lives and causing billions of dollars in damage.
China hopes that creating “sponge cities” will help
→Alsointhissection
62 Thespreadofgraffiti
63 Chaguan: The BidenXi summit