defined by his rejection of Islam. He is the
kafir, “the unbeliever” [...] from the time of
the Prophet to the present day, the ultimate
definition of the Other, the alien outsider
and presumptive enemy, has been kafir, the
unbeliever.^370Could this world-famous expert on Islam have made any
clearer the threat that the importation of Islam poses to the
West? Someone who was a highly-educated adult
throughout World War II, someone who lived through the
Nuremberg trials, through the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a
man who lived through the Cold War and the threat of
nuclear annihilation: when it came to identifying the
doctrine which was foremost in enshrining hatred of those
who are different, he did not choose National Socialism as
the paradigm case, but Islam.
Teachers, journalists, publishers, academics, clergy,
politicians do not point out what the expert opinion of Islam
was throughout the previous 150 years. Instead they repeat
(or at least fail to challenge) The Grand Lie. They attempt to
stifle any critique of Islam by bleating about
multiculturalism, a doctrine which is ideologically
incompatible with Islam. Not only is it incompatible in
theory, it has been incompatible since Mohammed had his
first “revelation”: Arabia was multicultural (consisting of
Pagans, Jews, Christians), and this very tolerance allowed
Islam to grow and thrive, until Mohammed had a
sufficiently large army that he could eradicate all that was
not Islam. Even the core texts of Islam make this clear. But