Discriminant function analysis:
Previously used for logistic
model
Restrictive normality
assumptions
Gives biased results – odds
ratio too high
ML estimation:
No restrictions on independent
variables
Preferred to discriminant
analysis
III. Unconditional vs.
Conditional Methods
Two alternative ML approaches:
- Unconditional method
- Conditional method
Require different computer
algorithms
User must choose appropriate
algorithm
Computer Programs
SAS
SPSS
Stata
Until the availability of computer software for
ML estimation, the method used to estimate
the parameters of a logistic model wasdiscrim-
inant function analysis. This method has been
shown by statisticians to be essentially a
least squares approach. Restrictive normality
assumptions on the independent variables in
the model are required to make statistical
inferences about the model parameters. In par-
ticular, if any of the independent variables are
dichotomous or categorical in nature, then the
discriminant function method tends to give
biased results, usually giving estimated odds
ratios that are too high.
ML estimation, on the other hand, requires no
restrictions of any kind on the characteristics
of the independent variables. Thus, when using
ML estimation, the independent variables can
be nominal, ordinal, and/or interval. Conse-
quently, ML estimation is to be preferred over
discriminant function analysis for fitting the
logistic model.
There are actually two alternative ML
approaches that can be used to estimate the
parameters in a logistic model. These are called
theunconditional methodand theconditional
method. These two methods require different
computer algorithms. Thus, researchers using
logistic regression modeling must decide
which of these two algorithms is appropriate
for their data. (See Computer Appendix.)
Three of the most widely available computer
packages for unconditional ML estimation of
the logistic model are SAS, SPSS, and Stata.
Programs for conditional ML estimation are
available in all three packages, but some are
restricted to special cases. (See Computer
Appendix.)
Presentation: III. Unconditional vs. Conditional Methods 107