Appendix 3.01 Survey of The Neurosciences and Music I
- Conference 2002
Part I:Poster PapersTitle, CategoryAimMus. Material, Cultural Ref.Technology & ProcedureMain focus of interestConclusion14P. Bey & Zatorre (152-154)Interleaved Melodies
Cat. 1: Melody
15P. Brattico et al. (155-
157)Electrical Brain Responses to Music
Cat. 2: Harmony
16P. Brattico et al. (158-
160)Acquired Deafness to Dissonance
Cat. 2: Consonance
/Dissonance
Cat. 11:DeficitNeural basis of auditory stream segregation
Neural correlates of aesthetic vs. descriptive listening of the same musical cadences
Distinction beween consonant and dissonant intervals by a patient and control subjectsTwo unfamiliar six-tonemelodies, one with distractor tones(SNI)CR:Western
180 five-chord cadences. 10with correct, 10 with ambiguous, 10 with incorrect ending(SNI)CR: Western
Two sets of four intervals: a ”consonant” and a ”dissonant”context(SNI)CR: NeutralfMRI. Decide whether the melodies are identical or different. 8 listeners
15 nonmusicians.
EEG while listening. Judging tasks: correct / incorrect or like / dislike
One patient, who had bilateral lesions in the auditory cortex, but intact hearing.
EEG while listeningDifference if the target melody is presented before or after the melody with distractor tones?
Activated neural resources, especially right frontocentral negativity
Effects of patient’sbilaterallesions in the auditory cortex
Event-Related Potentials(ERP), Mismatch Negativity(MMN)Similar cortical networks involved in both conditions
More neural resources are devoted to prepare an evaluative (aesthetic) listening The electrical brain responses did not differentiatebetweendissonance and consonance.Neural substrates underlying MMN generation are altered by patient’s brain lesions.P: indicates a short poster paper, e.g. 14P