4.3 Skew-Symmetric Determinants 75In the particular case in whichaij=1,i<j, denote Pfnby pf
n
anddenote Pf
(n)
r by pf(n)
r.Lemma.
pf
n=1.
The proof is by induction. Assume pf
m
=1,m<n, which impliespf
(n)
r
= 1. Then, from (4.3.19),pfn=2 n− 1
∑r=1(−1)
r+1
=1.Thus, if every Pfaffian of orderm<nis equal to 1, then every Pfaffian of
ordernis also equal to 1. But from (4.3.16), pf
1
= 1, hence pf
2
= 1, which
is confirmed by (4.3.17), pf
3
= 1, and so on.
The following important theorem relates Pfaffians to skew-symmetricdeterminants.
Theorem.
A 2 n= [Pfn]2
.The proof is again by induction. AssumeA 2 m= [Pfm]2
,m<n,which implies
A
(2n−1)
ii=
[
Pf(n)
i] 2
.
Hence, referring to (4.3.9),
[
A
(2n−1)
ij] 2
=A
(2n−1)
iiA
(2n−1)
jj=
[
Pf(n)
i Pf(n)
j] 2
A
(2n−1)
ijPf(n)
i Pf(n)
j=± 1 (4.3.22)
for all elementsaijfor whichaji=−aij. Letaij=1,i<j. Then
A
(2n−1)
ij→E
(2n−1)
ij=(−1)
i+j
,Pf(n)
i →pf(n)
i =1.Hence,
A
(2n−1)
ijPf(n)
i
Pf(n)
j=
E
(2n−1)
ijpf(n)
i
pf(n)
j=(−1)
i+j
, (4.3.23)