Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Thrid Edition: Model and Guidelines

Index 325

nonresearch evidence appraisal, 162
research evidence appraisal, 140–141
standards
performance, 40–41
practice, 37–39
Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice,
16, 189

O

opinion leaders, 175–176
OR Boolean operator, 87–88
organizational experience
financial evaluations, 155–156
cost-effectiveness analysis, 155
economic evaluations, 155
QI (quality improvement) reports,
153–155
organizational formats for research
classic, 136–139
IMRAD, 136–137
outcome identification, ANA standard of
practice, 38
outcomes, EBP (evidence-based practice), 9

P

Papers citation management software, 94
PARIHS (Promoting Action on Research
Implementation in Health Services)
model, 168–169
patient/consumer experiences, 159–161
PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute), 160
PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act), 5–6, 173
PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database),
87

PET (Practice question, Evidence, and

Translation) process, 17–18, 43–46

critical thinking, 23–28

evidence, 50–53, 264–265

appraising/selecting, 51, 84–87, 93–95

Individual Evidence Summary Tool,

51, 140, 252, 297–300

information formats, 80–81

Nonresearch Evidence Appraisal Tool,

51, 155, 158, 249–251, 291–295

recommending changes based on, 52

Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, 51,

140, 156, 245–248, 281–290

searches, revising, 94

searches, strategies, 80–93

searching for, 50–51

sources of, 50–51, 80–81

summarizing, 51

Synthesis Process and

Recommendations Tool, 51–52, 54,

140, 254–256, 301–307

synthesizing, 52

executive summary template, 178–180

PICO, 48–49, 74–76

practice questions, 46–50, 264–265

background/foreground questions, 48

defining EBP problems, 47, 65–71

defining stakeholders, 49, 77

developing EBP question, 47–49,

72–76

Question Development Tool, 24, 49,

55, 64, 81–82, 241–242, 267–272

recruiting interprofessional team,

46–47, 64–65

scheduling team meetings, 50, 77

translation, 264–265

Action Planning Tool, 55, 256–257,

309–312

action plans, 54–55, 174–180

disseminating findings, 57, 180–182

Dissemination Tool, 56–57, 258–259,

313–315

EBP versus QI and research, 173–174

evaluating recommendations, 53–54

identifying required steps, 56–57

KTA (Knowledge to Action) model,

168–169